In history of human being, the issue of differences between sexes always have been always controversial. There have been many great minds who have pondered that concerns, but no one made a conclusive solution until now. Some people might think that men and women are not equally suited for doing many tasks because of their inherent physical differences. However, in the following it shall be argued that all human beings have rights to be deserved equally even if there are some differences related to their physical abilities.
Admittedly, we cannot ignore several innate differences between men and women. For example, some men are more strong than some women in average. Some women can speak in their language faster than some men of the same age. Furthermore, it is not hard to see what is different from men and women. Although there are some deviations from average men and women, many people can admit that there are some disparity of the two sexes.
However, the existence of innate physical differences should not be the ground of discrimination to men and women. First of all, beside of the real physical differences of both sexes, there have been a lot of differences which have been made by culture for hundreds or thousands years. During decades of centuries, people have thought that men are superior over women in average. Men are more rational and intelligent than women. Men should pass a infortant judgement and women ought to obey what men say. This kind of cultural gender norm remains nowadays. But, after enlightenment, people realized that men and women are same human being and should be treated equally.
Additionally, people can make their own choice of what they want to and do not want. Their inherent physical differences can not be a reason that other people order them not to do take responsibilities for some tasks. If some people have their own disabilities or other problems, it should be their own choices to decide what they will do or not. Some differences of people's physical abilities should not be a priority of their freedom for setting their own future.
Lastly, although the author states that there are "many tasks" which have to be treated unequally, it needs to be evaluated logically. Are there many tasks that only men can do or only women can? I think, no one can firmly assure that "this job" should not be permitted to women or men. For example, in conventional wisdoms, people thinks that men are more suitable to be police officers, but nowadays, people know that women also are needed for the polices. Like this, almost every jobs need both sexes and no one can decide who are more fit to some jobs or not.
Consequently, while the author asserts that men and women are unequally treated due to thier inherent physical differences, I found that all people have their own right to decide what to do and there is no serious ground to treat them unequally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... related to their physical abilities. Admittedly, we cannot ignore several inn...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e are some disparity of the two sexes. However, the existence of innate physica...
^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...intelligent than women. Men should pass a infortant judgement and women ought to ...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n being and should be treated equally. Additionally, people can make their own ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...freedom for setting their own future. Lastly, although the author states that ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who are more fit to some jobs or not. Consequently, while the author asserts t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, while, for example, i think, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87975951904 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5825762567 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440881763527 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.0 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9827158091 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6538461538 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1923076923 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25424194472 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905610169305 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611638622411 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147766988296 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398862824409 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.