While some people argue that colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach, however, it might not be valid in all circumstances. In the following essays, it shall be argued that such mandatory policies to all faculty might cause a couple of problems with three reasons.
Admittedly, it seems agreeable that working in the real world could help faculty to improve their teaching know-how and skills. Working in a relevant filed can give valuable experience and make them expand their perspectives. Thus, their improvement could benefit students whom they will teach. More broad and deep knowledge with real experience will make the course more useful for students. Therefore, it is plausible to agree with the statement at first glance.
However, though the claim has several advantages, it is not necessary for all faculty to work outside the academic world for three reasons. First of all, there are subjects which do not require real-experience. For example, some professors of the department of literature or philosophy do not need to get a job relevant to their majors. Rather than, it would be better for them just to read and read several books and organize their thought. Thus, making them work outside the academic world may be wasteful for their time and energy.
Secondly, even if working outside the academic world has merits for some faculty, it will be hard to support all of them. Let's think about it practically. If some professors start working at companies, museums, or other places. Then, their colleges and universities should support their salaries to do their job and hire more professors to teach students while original professors work. Finally, the cost of all these things is own to students who attend colleges and universities. Consequently, it seems way expensive to implement the alleged policy.
Lastly, since all faculty in colleges and universities are experts in their specific field, even if there is some money to afford their jobs, it would be impossible to find suitable jobs that are relevant to their major and give precious experience to them. Many professors already experienced the working experience relevant to their major during their doctorate courses, thus, finding meaningful jobs for them will be harder than we expected.
In sum, the statement that colleges and universities ought to demand working experience outside the academic world to their faculty has some benefits, nonetheless, it should be evaluated with some anticipated issues such as the necessity for some subjects, economic burdens, possibility to get a suitable job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: SOME_FACULTY[1]
Message: Use 'faculty members'.
Suggestion: faculty members
... the academic world has merits for some faculty, it will be hard to support all of them...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...it will be hard to support all of them. Lets think about it practically. If some pro...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, lastly, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2262.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24825986079 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7388963235 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477958236659 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6791483411 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5238095238 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38095238095 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351718723497 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111245042687 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118894657479 0.0758088955206 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210446759163 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106522546027 0.0667264976115 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.