In rapid chaning decades, traveling to several places has been easy to most people. While some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one's ability to relate and connect to other people but others assert that this ability is better nurtured by living in one place and developling a deep understanding of that community. This following essay will address both opinions and largely agree with the later argument with below reasons and examples.
Admiettedly, it sounds a bit romantic to move to a certain place and living in there and after adapting to that place, trying to travel to another place. Living in numerouns places may contribute to increase one's capability to communciate with various people who have different norms and cultures. For exmaple, people who are living in Cuba may have different gestures and sign of expressions which can display their emotion to others with people who are living in South Korea. Living in that place, seeing by oneself, and learning by native people seems helpful to cultivate to adjust several culture than learning by just reading a book or watching a Youbute clip.
However, this oppinion may not be the best choice for learning about communication with people who are different from learner's society. First of all, it is not practical. Moving from one place to other place which is far from former places may costly to afford for everyone. Living cost and getting a accomodation or home is also demanding for someone. If someone who want to learn from other countries and try to move and move, he or she may not get an adequate jop because it is hard and uncertain to stay one place.
Moreover, traveling and living in a lot of places is not fit with cultivating an ability of relating and connecting to other people. Every country has their own norms, values and customs which tell their members of society what they ought to do or ought not to do. If someone travels almost all countries, it is difficult to remember all of those customs and adapt it when the knowlege is needed. Rather, living in one place, hanging out with neighborhood, and develpoing deep relations with them is better choice to learn to have a relation with others because we cannot know fully about someone by just seeing a day or just a week so it will take several months, even years to have a sincere relationship with others. As staying longer and longer, it is natural to cultivate an capability to listen to, communicate with, and share their physical and emotional thing with others.
Therefore, the claim that for nurturing the ability to relate and connect to other people traveling and living in numerous places may not be the best choice in certain circumstances relating time, job, and cost. Thus, to achieve a given purpose, it is better to stay and live in one place for having a real and deep relation with other people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...and living in numerous places increases ones ability to relate and connect to other ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...rouns places may contribute to increase ones capability to communciate with various ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun culture seems to be countable; consider using: 'several cultures'.
Suggestion: several cultures
...le seems helpful to cultivate to adjust several culture than learning by just reading a book or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d for everyone. Living cost and getting a accomodation or home is also demanding ...
^
Line 7, column 778, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... and longer, it is natural to cultivate an capability to listen to, communicate wi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2405.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 498.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82931726908 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51282496121 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481927710843 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9814723874 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.578947368 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2105263158 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452084879229 0.243740707755 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152217040759 0.0831039109588 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16640704054 0.0758088955206 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308032111202 0.150359130593 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137525150224 0.0667264976115 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.