Some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one’s ability
to relate and connect to other people. Others believe that this ability is better cultivated by
living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that community.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own
position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
One of the Argument states that, the travelling to many places increases person's ability to interact with other people. Other side says it is rather cultivated by living on the same place and developing a deep understanding of that particular community. I take a middle ground and I am going to prove that both will help to improve their inter personal skills with various examples. I will discuss about how travelling to other places will benefit them and how staying on the same place is going to improve their understanding about particular culture.
First, Different countries have different culture, language, religion and several customary practices. Even with the same country, there can be different ethinicity, language, culture. The practice one follows in one part of world is not applicable to others. For example, Japanese people are very polite and humble. They respect people in the way they address everyone by adding San to their names. While accepting or give something to others, Japanese people hand over with both hands. This is something which we can't learn by residing in other parts of the world. It is not allowed followed in any other parts of the world. So travelling to countries improves our understanding about their culture and practices. Even with in the same country or state, choice of words differs. For Instance, Within Tamilnadu, a state in India, few words are highly disrespectful and whereas in other parts of tamilnadu, it is not considered so serious and it is in colloquial usage. So, it is always better to travel to different places be it with in a country or to different country will certainly improve our understanding of other people and figure out better ways to interact with them.
Furthermore, Language and religious practices are key to understand a set of the communities culture. The more we travel and stay at different sites, we get to know more about their language and religion. Japanese people will have liking to certain types of food and Americans have different food taste. During casual interaction, we can talk about the food they like, that inturn will make them happy and eventually will lead to better relationship with them. So travelling helps in understanding about the taste of people and that improves our conversing skills.
Finally, Though travelling to different places help to get better idea of other communities, It is not practicable possible to understand their community entirely. So one should consider staying in a place for longer period of time to understand their slang, deep rooted heritage, food and other practices, that particular community is fond of. Staying on the same place for longer time, makes their native people think that we are part of community, which will lead to better relationship.
In conclusion, Travelling to other regions helps to understand the culture of different people and staying on the same place for longer time will help us in gaining deeper understanding of those people. Both of them will improve our abilities to relate and connecte to other people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... both hands. This is something which we cant learn by residing in other parts of the...
^^^^
Line 13, column 218, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... consider staying in a place for longer period of time to understand their slang, deep rooted ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2588.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10453648915 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74969649495 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435897435897 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 811.8 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8307302941 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5384615385 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57692307692 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278752232064 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878840736783 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831677924224 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189029420695 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786733394107 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.