Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.

Controversies are often created when two parties who have extremely different views or perspectives on a particular topic. It is beneficial to discuss controversial topics with people who have contrasting views. In any situation where people have different opinions on something, there is always a right side and a wrong side. For any controversy to lead to a conclusion, one should be picking the right side, and the right side can be determined only by discussing a controversial topic, with contrasting views and considering both sides of the stories.
Whenever there is a controversy established under the influence of a public figure and it is against the public's views, then it is often known by the history of controversies that people always misunderstand the views of a public figure or a celebrity. During these times, miscommunication plays a major role in the birth of a controversy. If the consequences of a controversy are harmful to the society in any way, it is always better to clear all the misconceptions and draw to a conclusion which is positive to every party, in this case the celebrity and the audience.
Usually, there are always instances of controversies between a government and it's people. As the influential stake is high in this case, there is always a gap of communication between the government and people, though there is technology like social media, with which a controversy can spread like a wild fire. In this case, both the parties stories are to be heard and a best conclusion must be drawn, which can be in favour of the government and the people. For instance, in the year 2019, a huge controversy was raised among the people of the United States regarding the apparent counterfeit voter machines during the elections. This was between Donald Trump and his followers versus the voters. In this scenario, all the people and officials of America came together with evidence of truth.
It is evident that miscommunication, misconceptions or false accusations on people often lead to controversies. So, the best one can do in these circumstances is to discuss their contrasting views and build a gap between, so that there is no place to controversies. Even though it is true that a very few people change their minds when questioned about their core beliefs, it is always suggested to discuss controversial topics with contrasting views on a topic because then each party will get to hear the pros, cons, reasons and compulsions they had to consider that made them on that side of the party.

Votes

Essay Categories

GMAT/GRE Issue Task

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...like a wild fire. In this case, both the parties stories are to be heard and a be...
^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...he parties stories are to be heard and a best conclusion must be drawn, which ca...
^
Line 4, column 387, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested discussing'.
Suggestion: suggested discussing
... about their core beliefs, it is always suggested to discuss controversial topics with contrasting v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, for instance, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96235294118 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11159545854 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.3769695117 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.8125 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5625 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0625 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334055763106 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987396249929 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124680284152 0.0758088955206 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200983407921 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152350762353 0.0667264976115 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, for instance, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this: