Do you think that technological advancement has brought more harm than good? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Technology is a very powerful tool and this power can be availed by anyone and everyone. But it is also true that with great power comes great responsibility. Humans are dependent on technology to a large extent. Right from the tip of the pen to the zip of a bag, everything is technology.
Technology has certainly eased our life by reducing the physical strain required to do daily activities like washing clothes, dishes, cleaning floor, etc. Buying grocery, ordering food, banking, paying bills and even digital socializing, everything is available at a swipe on the screen. Technology has rightly served us in the advanced health care facilities, travelling and connecting with loved ones who live far away.
People tend to take advantage of technology even for menial tasks. The habit of working hard and working diligently is allevating. People indulge a lot in social media and this has even affected the mental well being of many individuals. Long hours of staring at the screen puts a lot of strain n the eyes and the mind. Youngsters prefer to play video games like Counter Strike and PUBG instead of playing actual games on the field. The time which we should have saved by the use of technology is being used up in putting extra hours in work. The very purpose of technology - saving a person's time and easing his/her life, has being forgotten.
Technology certainly has detrimental effects on the humans. But it is in our hands how to use it. It will take time for everyone to realize how to use it for their own development. But I hope we realize it in time before there is some other outbreak of some kind of mental illness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76573426573 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64470718174 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604895104895 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0370142029 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.7222222222 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101033964567 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303947814275 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304945622987 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574342717631 0.150359130593 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118850932029 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.