The Drawbacks To The Use Of Nuclear Power Mean That It Is Not A Long Lasting Solution To The Problem Of Meeting Ever-increasing Energy Needs
Recently, there is an increase of interest of using nuclear power as an alternative source of energy for the increasing energy needs since it possesses high number of output and efficiency compared to the other alternative methods. However, while it seems to be beneficial for fulfilling the energy needs for humanity, it may actually bring more negative drawbacks compared to the other alternatives.
First of all, radioactive substances as the main components of nuclear power, are inevitably expensive. Compared to the other energy alternatives such as wind power and water power, it is obviously evident that both of them are much cheaper source compared to nuclear power. That is the reason why many developed countries are not really interested in developing nuclear power as their main source of energy. One of the example is Denmark, which has successfully implemented the use of wind power as their main source of energy for the whole country. Their main reason why they use the wind power is not only wind power is cheap, but also wind power also does not emit detrimental waste. Therefore, even though it is known that nuclear power is environmental-friendly, it is not economic-friendly at all.
Second reason, establishing and running nuclear power plant definitely have a lot of risks. Radioactive substances are very harmful to the health, and therefore, scrutinized measures are needed to be undertaken for the standard operation process throughout the whole process. Such strict control not only bring up the cost for the security maintenance, but also it implies that if something goes wrong, even though the probability is 1% or below, there will be a huge disaster. For instance, several years ago there was a huge nuclear incident in Fukushima, Japan, where thousands of lives taken because of the explosion of Fukushima nuclear power plant. Furthermore, the aftermath effect is not something that can go away in short term. Even until now, radioactive substances are still present throughout the exploded area, and such place become highly dangerous for people. That disaster happened in Japan, where the control process is extremely marvelous, then you can imagine, what can be happened in the places where the control measures are not as strict as there? We know that in three decades back ago, there was a similar disaster in Ukraine, exactly in Chernobyl, which was far worse. Until now, Chernobyl is a ghost town which still have radioactive materials everywhere. Hence, the high risk of nuclear power makes it the last choice for the alternative energy for now.
It is previously known that nuclear power is environmentally friendly and be able to provide a huge amount of energy compared to other alternative method of the energy source. Therefore, it is theoretically possible to provide a long-term solution for the increasing energy needs with environmental-friendly output. However, the high cost and the risk of such which will be put in burden for the people might make government and investors think twice before building one. Since it is not cheap, people may need to pay more for their electricity, and the environmental risk will give much more loss compared to the other alternatives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, really, second, so, still, then, therefore, while, for instance, in short, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2702.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11742424242 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78404452652 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465909090909 0.4932671777 94% => OK
syllable_count: 867.6 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.740449438202 405% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0986250313 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.818181818 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249091850952 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772590060114 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701587043291 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163924501208 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501978083508 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.