Schools, being an institute for career preparation, has the responsibility to guide their students to success in their careers. Yet, I do not totally agree that schools should dissuade students from pursuing fields that they are unlikely to succeed.
The first reason is that no one is able to predict the future of a student, and the schools have no way to know which fields a student is more likely to succeed. The school's opinion, or more often, the teachers opinions, are usually biased viewpoint which is based on their own personal experience and of nelgect individual experience. It is especially true when in comes to students who want to pursue careers that are not the mainstream of the scoiety. For instance it is commonplace for teachers tell their students to study hard because higher education surely leads to greater fortune and better future. However, for students who find no interest in reading textbooks but devoted to some skills like music, they are often forced to forfeit their talents and to study subjects that they are not intereted in.
Another reason why schools should not dissaude their students from pursuing fields in which they are unlikely to succed is that schools often pursaude students to study fields that are in high demands of talented people, however no one can know for sure the future trend of the industry. Machine learning, a subset of artifitial intelligence, has gone viral in recent years. Yet, what few people know is that machine learning is once a field that see no promise. Back in that time, very few people study machine learning becasue due to hardware constraints, theories developed in that fields are no way realizable. However, thanks to the rapid improvement of hardware, this field has resurrect in recent years. If all students are dissuaded from studying this field, the popularity of machine learning wil never come even if all hardwares are mature enough.
Some may aruge that most students lack experiences to decide what they are really interested in, and because schools, or usually teachers, have more exeperiences, they may still make better decisions that students. It is true that many students are lack of experiences and may fumble in their life if schools don't guide them, but failure is also a way of learning, and in fact, it is the most precious experiences one can ever have -- if we fail, we certainly know what not to do the next time. Thus, dissuading students form studying some fields, may prevent them from failure in the short term, but may inhibit their opportunity to learn for themselves in the long run.
Since schools can rarely predict the future trend, nor can they give students advices based on theiry own characteristics, schools should not promulgate certain fields and downplay others. What schools should do is to provide students with enough, and up-to-date information for students, and let them choose the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
... student is more likely to succeed. The schools opinion, or more often, the teachers op...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 685, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'resurrected'.
Suggestion: resurrected
...improvement of hardware, this field has resurrect in recent years. If all students are di...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...and may fumble in their life if schools dont guide them, but failure is also a way o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, so, still, thus, for instance, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2442.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01437371663 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58685135239 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486652977413 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1850997338 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0555555556 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234411579706 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078069344534 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624286014437 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14034598228 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646374832727 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.