Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Internet access and public transportation are both important in our daily lives. When governments take care of these two aspects, citizens can live their lives with much greater convenience. With that said, I don't agree that improving Internet access is more important than improving public transportation.
First of all, Internet accessibility problems are more solvable by individuals. Nowadays, we can get internet access at schools, libraries, or at our workspace. Since people can easily go to public places where Internet is offered, the lack of internet accessibility at certain areas are not such a big problem. On the other hand, if there isn't any public transportation in the neighborhood, than the whole neighborhood would be affected. People may be willing to commute a little to get Internet access, but they definitely won't do that for public transportations. If I should drive three blocks to take a bus, I can just drive to the place I want to go instead.
Second, it is much more essential to guarantee convenient transportation than Internet access. Sure, Internet may be necessary in some corporations, schools, or research institutes, but other than that, households actually can live without Internet access. Some may argue that they can't live without browsing websites 24 hours a day, but this is simply not true. Public transportations, when implemented well, however can bring much greater benefits. Well organized bus routes and train stations, for instance, can hugely mitigate traffic problems, while at the same time reduce pollutions caused by driving. These public transportation stations can actually speed up progress in rural areas, helping their economy, and bring other improvements, for example internet access, more easily implemented.
To sum up, while Internet access and public transportations are both important, I believe that Internet access is only essential at certain places, and having public transportation is actually more important when compared with gaining Internet access. Based on the reasons provided above, I disagree with the statement that governments should spend more money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... greater convenience. With that said, I dont agree that improving Internet access is...
^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ig problem. On the other hand, if there isnt any public transportation in the neighb...
^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... live without Internet access. Some may argue that they cant live without browsing we...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ternet access. Some may argue that they cant live without browsing websites 24 hours...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51622418879 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10134872589 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545722713864 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5586621347 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351101100039 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131707534294 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146172950613 0.0737576698707 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26012569019 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123279693585 0.0645574589148 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.