Universities should not encourage students to study certain subjects. To live free or die.
The classic command economy tells students the predictions for the future and hopes that everything will go well. The last planned economy took place in the Soviet Union, when the Soviet Union sent small cups to the store and sent rotten tomatoes from Uzbekistan to Moscow. There will always be smart people who use other people's assets to gamble, then jump around and jump because they are too smart. Send students 3-4 years of road and hope that the job will continue and there will be no major economic changes. The average economic cycle is 8-10 years, prosperous, depressed and long-term recovery. If all the universities in a country encourage this, it will be a catastrophe. For example, 8 million EU university graduates have gone there, they all learn C++. Imagine it will make you feel scared.
Similarly, in this highly demanding world, just inspiration is not enough. A person needs to be successful. Talent is born with it, it is shaped by innate and acquired. If a person is very talented in a field, then he/she is unlikely to have the same talent in another field. When people are encouraged to follow their talents, they will definitely surpass those who are less talented in the same field. For example, if I have good physical talent, I will definitely surpass those who don't have much physical talent, just want to enter because of physics. In this case, even if the physical job security may be less, I will still find a good job, because I will surpass others because of my talent.
More should be considered the success of the entire society. The reason for the large number of job opportunities in one area is that they have a large demand. The lack of talent in society in these areas requires the filling of these vacancies. Educational institutions can help alleviate this scarcity by encouraging people to enter these areas. For example, if there is a lot of welding work, this means that there are not enough welders to fill the work. Through educational institutions to encourage people to enter areas that require more talent, they can allocate resources more optimally. In the words of Thomas Sowell, “scarce resources with alternative uses” are issues that should always be considered in distribution. People are a scarce resource. If they are not properly distributed, there is always opportunity cost. The market is a good way to decide where you need the most talent. People entering the already saturated field not only hurt them but also the whole society. So what I want to say is that it is better to encourage people to enter areas where there is more work.
Finally, the university has a responsibility to society and every student who attends college. Society requires people to pursue a variety of careers. In addition, each student has different expectations for the university. If a university focuses only on specific areas of research, it cannot treat society and many students fairly. By providing a fair and quality education for all, the university can develop graduates who excel in any field and contribute to society.
It is widely believed that educational institutions should actively encourage students to pursue degrees in areas where employment opportunities are high. Although, I can see the advantages of the proposed policy, I cannot agree with this statement, as the reasons will be discussed in detail above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 486, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nt, I will definitely surpass those who dont have much physical talent, just want to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, similarly, so, still, then, well, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2920.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 582.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01718213058 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91168771031 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70711433361 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494845360825 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 943.2 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 36.0 20.2370786517 178% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0497246787 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1111111111 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41666666667 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133408502626 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346009767407 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379921879182 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868794467965 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387567308617 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.