To understand a society, major cities can’t be ignored, but rural area also needs more attention.
The argument of to understand a society, one must study its major cities is undeniable. A major city, it’s a society of its own. It usually has all the meaning of human sustenance, and population live and die inside a city. The highway outside a city is a barrier, dividing two different societies. If everything is so different, to have an idea of the major society, nobody should ignore major cities.
Less developed countries have more rural population than urban, major cities may mean only a small portion of population. For example, Bhutan, a nation virtually has no city. Another example, Mongolia, a nation has one city, Ulaanbaatar. When 90% of population lives outside of the city, removing cities from study list won’t cause major omission.
Cities are usually pinnacle of a civilization; every residence brings something different from their home. History, tradition, culture, religion and language. Visiting a few city could have a good generalization of a whole nation. The vast different among cities and rural areas due to economics reasons remind any researcher not to overlook country sides. When we study society across different time, cities changed so much. Before the Enlightenment, city population is in an perpetual decline, people had a significant higher death rate in cities. Only the higher wages lure uninformed farm boys to chase a city dream. Such divide will make us learn more about rural areas.
Many people worry that the answer is absolutely long-term research, but the characteristics of society, research should not ignore any big city. Before proceeding, you must clarify some elements of the vocabulary. The city is defined as a place for a large group of people and cathedrals, according to the Webster's Dictionary. Or in a simpler, more secular term, a place with more people. Society is the gathering of the people. At this point, the article does not need more. A group of people you can't learn "Many people who don't study." This is not the way to study. When sampling groups, researchers should not turn a blind eye to a group of people who are blindly opposed, especially the choice. The problem I am not arguing here is illegal or misleading, but the fact that other people's responses can be neglected is the people of society. Many people are mostly through the "not supposed" research group. This is ridiculous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 475, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...he Enlightenment, city population is in an perpetual decline, people had a signifi...
^^
Line 9, column 499, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...es not need more. A group of people you cant learn 'Many people who dont study....
^^^^
Line 9, column 532, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...le you cant learn 'Many people who dont study.' This is not the way to stu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 2260.96107784 93% => OK
No of words: 409.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13447432763 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84121466317 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 204.123752495 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564792176039 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 705.55239521 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 19.7664670659 147% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9307997825 57.8364921388 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.4137931034 119.503703932 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1034482759 23.324526521 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.41379310345 5.70786347227 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.67664670659 342% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129625975955 0.218282227539 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348587196856 0.0743258471296 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489748658589 0.0701772020484 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765928890111 0.128457276422 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434151546043 0.0628817314937 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.3799401198 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.3550499002 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 98.500998004 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.