Media coverage does plays an important role in making or breaking a person's image but it is very difficult to misguide public these days. Public also understands that media is either exaggerating or showing wrong image of popular personalities. At the same time if the media scrutiny is justified then certainly the true picture should come in front of public. Every person has an ideal in his or her life and we all make endeavors to be like them. Most of us have leaders or actors as our ideals. In this present age of satellite communication it has become possible for us to know about the life styles of our ideals. We are aware of everything related to their lives rather we feel that they have become a part of our lives. This all has become possible because of media and we are able to see our ideals in happiness and in grief. I believe that in this age of wide media coverage it is possible for us to be well aware about our celebrities and because of media coverage only we are able to know them better. Although their reputation is subjected to media scrutiny but these personalities are more known to common people and more people regard them as their hero.
In the contemporary word, nobody can ascend to a person of superhuman qualities and often semidivine, who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. The word “heros” is derived from a protagonist of an epic, a great journey full of trials and peculiar circumstances. “God is dead, everything is permitted,” thus sparks(it is spark, go learn Iglish, son!) Zarathustra. When the Gods spectating from the high haven is no longer divine nor hallow, a mere mortal can claim no hero status.
A hero king, the greatest among all, leads battle cries in the unknow world, explorer the Atlantic barrier and conquered North America the first. We born too early or too late, the great age of discovery has come to an end, and the final frontier, outer space is still veiled. Too bad no millennials is going to Pluto in their life time, either it is planet or dwarf will be a mystery too soon to solve. When Fox or CNN declare someone is a national hero, he or she is dead, and on the internet, they are murders and criminals. Everyone can disagree and no common interest too great to not say something for free. Free speech is free, so everyone can be wrong. Dead wrong won’t cost your home, wife and 3 kids. So nobody can be a hero without dissonance.
IIn this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero. The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. In conclusion, this is a bad essay, so I can be your hero.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...pos;God is dead, everything is permitted,' thus sparksit is spark, go learn Iglis...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'bore'?
Suggestion: bore
...d conquered North America the first. We born too early or too late, the great age of...
^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
... millennials is going to Pluto in their life time, either it is planet or dwarf will be a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, then, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61710794297 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71648897426 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525458248473 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8795142524 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.68 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.64 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.56 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203754407751 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590667194695 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994243331289 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148478785901 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11330024829 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.