Some people believe that advanced technology enables people to interact more with others while some think that it prevents us from engaging. The impact of advancement in technology on modern life is unmeasurable. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my opinion.
On the one hand, modern technology has blessed us with advanced communication tools that have simplified the way people communicate and I agree. It includes electronic mails, fax, smartphones, social networking applications, internet, etc. while sitting in the comfort of their home one can interact with people around the globe using smart gadgets and internet rather than engaging with only friends and family locally as was the practice in old days. Furthermore, it allows making new friends and connects with people sharing the same interests. For instance, I joined a facebook group for IELTS preparation that had members from around the world, who shared knowledge and helped each other to achieve their goal. Moreover, it is now easier to stay in contact with family and friends as compared to the past through social networking applications. Whenever I wish, I can call my parents overseas using video calling application like skype in mobile.
On the other hand, some people believe that modern technology has made us isolated. As people spend more time in the virtual world so they are disconnected from the real world, as a result, they avoid going out in parks and local clubs to meet people. In a recent study on the impact of technology on adult psychology, it was revealed that in spite of being entertained and less bored, majority of people were found depressed due to lack of face to face interaction with people. Technological advancement though keeps us entertained and open to the world yet ironically keep us less attentive to people closest to us.
In conclusion, despite people having a different opinion, I believe that advancement in technology has provided us with alternate and more quicker ways of being social and enabled us to engage with people both locally and globally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'quicker' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: quicker
...logy has provided us with alternate and more quicker ways of being social and enabled us to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1081871345 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7504239517 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558479532164 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1009939225 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.466666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278743889642 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977176055778 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868975875906 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199596521722 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110744862009 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.