The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
As human beings, we have always discovered solutions for everything since we started thinking millions of years ago. Therefore, we are always looking for the best ideas and the definitive solution. While as my concern, not all the best ideas derive from a passionate interest in common things, which is crucial in some conditions. Accordingly, while we are discussing the issue to find a definitive conclusion; unfortunately, we must analyze the cases in parts due to the complexity of the world. I will address my points of view as below.
To begin with, there are some better solutions to common things due to the passion of the people who discovered them. There were many cases in the scientific field. Because science is required of people to spend time and energy perpetually, many of the theories and inventions come from constant decisions in the field. Not everyone who was hit by the lightning could find the theory of conductivity while Franklin did it. As he had always been studying physics, the reckless adventure for him was the best way to find Franklin's great theories of forces. Similarly, the doctor who wanted to help those soldiers wounded in Russo-Turkish war, discovered heroin by accident when he purifies his opium a thousand times without deprivation. While after this discovery, millions of people were free of worry-bugs since then. It was the doctor's perpetual effort that made this discovery happen. Then, without the constant and passionate interest or deviation, the best ideas may not arise.
Even though, as the Chinese philosopher Laojun told us, he is not so absolute about the things he can conceive as right, the best ideas may not come from the conditions I mentioned earlier. Water will always defeat stone in the spring, and tongue survives every clash with teeth. In that world the world gets complicated and people always take some freedom to travel for free. Or in other words, people always assume that the limit of their own views is the limit of the world, said Schopenhauer. The ideal is all human’s striving end, according to Hegel. Therefore, we must consider the complexity of people around the world. Liberty is not free, but our fathers and funding ancestors paid beforehand. Consequently, our passion for liberty must bank for future generations.
As my concern, there are some cases in which the best ideas come from unusual conditions. Decades ago, there was a difficult problem for NASA, they wanted to invent a pen that astronauts could use as long as possible without the second time they put to ink. Since it would be another charge to bring ink to the shuttle space. While for months there was still no better solution to this problem. So, unusually, they post an ad in the newspapers to ask about this solution. A few weeks, they received a letter from a student in elementary school. They were already surprised that a student could give them advice. Then it was time to scandalize them, the child asked them: "Have you ever tried with a pencil?" This was the best solution at that time. So this case was unusual enough to surprise everyone who knew the event.
In conclusion, according to what I argue, not all the best ideas come from the commonplace with the passionate interest of the people due to the complexity of the world. In addition, we must know that the world itself may not be what worries us. Trifling with the herd won’t dig us up to the mountains, according to Zarathustra, we shall bring our passion down the hill, to the forest and the field all commoners reside.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 537, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to end'
Suggestion: to end
... The ideal is all human's striving end, according to Hegel. Therefore, we must...
^^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ithout the second time they put to ink. Since it would be another charge to bring ink...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 327, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...arge to bring ink to the shuttle space. While for months there was still no better so...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, if, look, may, second, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3036.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 618.0 442.535393258 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91262135922 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98594081286 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65388940981 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 306.0 215.323595506 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495145631068 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 929.7 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6413844386 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7428571429 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6571428571 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68571428571 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171650429261 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428790444494 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668602037166 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121757351318 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898207426698 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.