Educators should base their assessment of students' learning not on students' grasps of facts but on the ability to explain the ideas, trend, and concepts that those facts illustrate.
Educators should focus more on assessing a student on his clarity of ideas and concepts rather than just grasped theories. I completely agree with the idea of the issue. The overall assessment of any student must be done on his ability of understanding not on memorizing.
First of all, let's take a look how major education policies around the world are running. Most of the countries are running old, stereotyped policies, which are not at all logical in modern era. These policies focus on judging the student only on his ability to grasp the things. The exam patterns are also so weak, that there are no ways to actually analyze students' caliber. These students find it difficult to cope up with latest inventions and fail to relate their knowledge with modern problems.
Secondly, let's take an example. The countries using old and pointless education policies are now finding it difficult to produce quality workers. The weak and illogical strategies have made the students logically weak. The main focus of any student is now only to grasp few theories and puke them out on the exam paper. They don't really bother to understand what concepts actually mean or why they are studying them.
Thirdly, because of only grasping the concepts and not having deep knowledge, the ability to judging and inventing the new ideas are vanishing from the students. In some areas, the situation is so bad that finding equivalent jobs and payments is getting arduous for many fresher. Like, in India most students (the products of this grasp to go policy), now find it extremely difficult to break in any multinational companies. Most of the standard recruiters deny the students who cannot provide practical solutions, because of inability and inexperience of logical thinking, improper understanding of concepts.
Fourthly, by keeping the students restricted to memorize the things and not understand, educators are inviting a deemed era of feckless and foolish bunch of guys, who cannot contribute towards welfare of society. Pragmatic knowledge brings ability to do discoveries that can change the world. The deep knowledge of any concept allows one to pass it to others. As, if one cannot analyze the fact properly, he will not be able to explain it to others.
In sum, if the educators do not stop these pointless grasping policies immediately, the quality of youth and students will keep decreasing. Thus, the overall progress of the society will also be blocked. So, educators should encourage the students to understand the concepts and try to relate them with real world problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...e students find it difficult to cope up with latest inventions and fail to relate their kno...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... have made the students logically weak. The main focus of any student is now only t...
^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...e made the students logically weak. The main focus of any student is now only to grasp few...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d puke them out on the exam paper. They dont really bother to understand what concep...
^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fresher seems to be countable; consider using: 'many freshers'.
Suggestion: many freshers
...obs and payments is getting arduous for many fresher. Like, in India most students the produ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o relate them with real world problems.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10588235294 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68716390028 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536470588235 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5685291273 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4166666667 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7083333333 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254168902351 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663333309779 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558378302691 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136748993177 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392822689061 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.