Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reas

Educators should teach facts only after students have studied the ideas, trends and concepts that help explain those facts. The above fact stated by the author is totally dismal in this case. Teaches are the philosopher, guide and friend of its pupils.
His or her duty is not to show facts rather how to deal with those facts as well as the robust reasons of those facts are also part of his or her curriculum. So, it is definitely not a substantial statement to say that Educators' duty is to only show facts to its students.

In ancient days of India and Asia, relation between Student and its teacher was not only limited to mere teaching. It was also dealt with educating the students about the reason and results of different facts. There was also exploring various teachings to solve the various complexities arose in that time. Sages, advisory played such a role to its pupils or for their masters. So, if it was totally based on the principle of teaching facts, then it would be not possible for several successful rulers across the world to control their kingdom.

The fact is that Student not only need to learn the ideas, trends and techniques but also know how to apply them in real life situation. By only judging facts, it is not always possible to get the actual result. So, a teacher's duty not only limited to educating about the facts but also enlighten his or her students about the different concepts more properly so that the application of their judgement brings some thing fruitful to them as well as to society.

But we cannot deny the fact, that in today's world there are several instances where we are observing that teachers are not as capable as to grow incitement about some serious topics which are really important for their life as well as career. They are just like reciting and showing up the facts to students without knowing how can be students taking these ideas.May be the student is well-grossed with good conception and trends, but totally unaware of how to apply such concept those in real life. So here, teacher's role comes into play.But author statement is totally opposite to this, which is some how misplaced in this context.

In several countries in South-East Asia like Vietnam, Japan, Taiwan where students are coerced by the teachers to improve their studies by engrossed themselves in long 12-13 hours study session. Teachers not only instructs their students to follow boring as well as dabbed study schedule but also provide some well-known facts to memorize them only for the sake of completing syllabus in time and for a good score. Result which is nothing but creating some unproductive hours which students are forced to consume to yield some unsubstantial learning during high school years-which results into students with some good memory but without sound judgement skills and as well as low productivity due to lack of proper ideas as well as unkempt about the application of the ideas.

So, it is teacher's duty to not only follow a narrow curriculum with some facts and subjects rather a well researched and broad curriculum to engross students not only with facts but also with several ideas, concepts as well as their proper implementation. So ,what author says is not agreeable to the real life context rather it can be mere a hypothesis without sound research.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sory played such a role to its pupils or for their masters. So, if it was totally...
^^
Line 6, column 219, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ossible to get the actual result. So, a teachers duty not only limited to educating abou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 411, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...e application of their judgement brings some thing fruitful to them as well as to society....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 364, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: May
... how can be students taking these ideas.May be the student is well-grossed with goo...
^^^
Line 8, column 368, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... can be students taking these ideas.May be the student is well-grossed with good c...
^^
Line 8, column 540, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
... So here, teachers role comes into play.But author statement is totally opposite to...
^^^
Line 8, column 599, Rule ID: SOME_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'somehow'?
Suggestion: somehow
...t is totally opposite to this, which is some how misplaced in this context. In severa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... well as their proper implementation. So ,what author says is not agreeable to the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, then, well, as to, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2771.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 572.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84440559441 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.472462524 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442307692308 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 841.5 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.9681893387 60.3974514979 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.952380952 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2380952381 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90476190476 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276783494474 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09303684133 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101831860847 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16033258711 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778370265855 0.0667264976115 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.