In the letter to the editor of a Batavia newspaper, it is written that the number of dairy firms has been increased by 25 percent against 10 years ago. During the same time price of milk also increased per gallon. So government decides to take the control in its hand to prevent farmers from making huge profit and regulate consumer prices to help consumers. From the statement it is quite evident that there are so many opaque things incorporated in the statement. With so many unclear facts, it is generally unwise to take such a drastic measure. We need to dig deeper to the fact.
First it is mentioned that dairy firms' count has been increased by 25 percent against the records 10 years ago and so there is greater supply of milks. But it is very fallacious judgement skill that author shows here. We cannot know how many dairy firms are there in the area that are producing only milks. We don't have proper records to substantiate the statement. May be those firms are only producing dairy products. So, it is not a good idea to glen the total facts from a not so well researched data.
Secondly, it is told there that there is a certain increase in the price of milks per gallon. So its neither means farmers are getting good profits nor they are charging high prices per gallon milk intentionally. It may be possible that cost of production is relatively high due to high market price of raw materials and as well as technologies that are immersed here to produce milks. So, at the end, what profit farmers earn cannot tally with the production cost, so they are reluctantly increasing the milk price. So, we have to well versed with the current market scenario as well as we have to make more survey regarding the current price stability in market to get the clear picture. Without well research, it is very immature to announce such things.
Thirdly, there is also a possibility as said earlier not all firms produce milks. So the number of firms that are left with milk-production are not able to meet market demand. So, there may be possibility that farmers are forced to import some high-end technical machines to maximize the production which may further adds up taxes and generally results into high cost production to generate more such milk amount. So, here also it is unwise to say that farmers are making bucks and government should intervene to regulate prices of milk.
Finally it can be said that judgement of the editorial based on so many extraneous and dabbed facts. So, without proper research about the market condition, it is very tough to reach into any conclusion. The above conclusion will be more solid and robust when there will be more availability of data with more samples of market research around the region.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... area that are producing only milks. We dont have proper records to substantiate the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ords to substantiate the statement. May be those firms are only producing dairy pr...
^^
Line 5, column 733, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thout well research, it is very immature to announce such things. Thirdly, the...
^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tion to generate more such milk amount. So, here also it is unwise to say that far...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...tervene to regulate prices of milk. Finally it can be said that judgement of the ed...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.6327345309 173% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 28.8173652695 118% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 55.5748502994 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 483.0 441.139720559 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71014492754 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4912330367 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 204.123752495 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467908902692 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 705.55239521 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.471057884232 212% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 19.7664670659 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6153658321 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.32 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88 5.70786347227 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0784165261683 0.218282227539 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289068150361 0.0743258471296 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786064173482 0.0701772020484 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0544856682202 0.128457276422 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067836064494 0.0628817314937 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.5979740519 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 98.500998004 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.