The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
The author brings up a controversial issue of whether the effectiveness of leaders is determined on the basis of the living conditions of their adherents enclosed within a country. Indisputably, Leadership is a quality which should be measured on the basis of response and support the leaders get from the public. Nevertheless, this response and support are not at all related to the well-being or living standards of the denizens of the country. Hence, I generally disagree with the opinion author brings up and would argue that it is mostly independent of well-being or living conditions of the citizens of a country.
First of all, there is no relation between the well-being of people proportional to the effective leadership the leaders instigate. To illustrate that, let's study the case of India before their Independence in 1947. Mahatma Gandhi who epitomized non-violence and started the Civil Disobedience movement had most the people following his ideology. These citizens' living conditions were hopeless due to lack of resources,education,poverty and above all dominance from the abhorred british policies due to which they had to live in restrained conditions. Using the ideologies and principles of Mahatma Gandhi India was able to become independent which shows his effective leadership quality. In this case we can clearly say that there is no relation between effectiveness of leadership and well-being of denizens of a country.
Moreover, the leadership quality should be determined on the basis of its positive impact to the people's lives rather than the present living standards of the people. For example, Martin Luther King Jr. through his Civil Disobedience policy was able to end long detested slavery in America which brought up an enormous amount of change in the lives of the black citizens of America compared to previous subjugated living conditions. Thus, leadership should be measured on the positive change made on the living conditions of the people rather than just measuring the current living quality.
On the other hand, leadership in very few cases such as governmental rule, it should be measured on the basis current living standards and consensus among people and such a leadership can be maintained efficiently by striking a proper balance between people's needs which government can fulfill and current living conditions of the people. Still an impressive governmental rule can also be judged on the basis of positive change the government brought to the country for the people.
In conclusion, I would like to like to state that in most of the cases of leadership can be measured on the basis of the positive difference created on the people's daily living standards over time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , education
...s were hopeless due to lack of resources,education,poverty and above all dominance from th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivil Disobedience policy was able to end long detested slavery in America which b...
^^
Line 4, column 339, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...urrent living conditions of the people. Still an impressive governmental rule can als...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'like to'.
Suggestion: like to
...for the people. In conclusion, I would like to like to state that in most of the cases of lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sion, I would like to like to state that in most of the cases of leadership can b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2289.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08686201008 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440366972477 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4035128907 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0625 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 5.21951772744 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139882811768 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595263272982 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466353260288 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084489941262 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299924746391 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.