Individuals accepting unjustified laws seems a rude statement. However, asserting that every individual should obey only those laws, which he/she realizes justified, is also a risky statement. I believe both the pros and cons are attached to this obedience or disobedience.
Firstly, let’s focus on the pros of the statement in the question. On providing each individual, the freedom to decide, if a particular law seems right promotes equality. Rules are made by people only, as per the situations and need to be regularly updated. This renewal as per the requirement can only happen if people tend to start opposing rules which are not for them or in line with the need of the time. For example, assume a country passed a law for a limit on the number of children a couple could have, say 1. This rule was adopted maybe because the country was facing a high population crisis, but now the situation is under control. So, in the current case, this law has to be amended or resisted, or else people could soon face an existential crisis or lack of youth population.
Also, the gall to disobey among the people will provide feedback to the system of law. Rules would be comprehensive in terms of including the interests of all. For example, a government can pass or retain laws which are favorable for the rich, and not very comforting for the poor ones. Immediate resistance to these policies will lead to better governance.
Although we feel more democratic after asserting that the citizens must rebel or reject the laws they disagree with, we have some cons attached to this freedom as well. It’s hard to say that individuals are the right ones to decide the justness of any law. At least not all. Once we provoke every citizen to rebel against whatever they feel wrong will create chaos. Governance is not possible in such a scenario. Laws are passed, considering the overall benefit they can provide. It means we will have some tradeoffs to handle or the bill wouldn’t be fruitful to all sections of the society. This complexity is the reason we elect capable people to represent mostly all the sections and interests of a community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... justness of any law. At least not all. Once we provoke every citizen to rebel again...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, well, as to, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82972972973 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67224595912 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575675675676 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5603607434 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.2272727273 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157189965604 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420693541202 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538458128636 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100699894338 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521060171716 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.