the first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar
I agree with the fact that in order to learn something new one must accept the fact that he/she does not anything about new things that one wants to learn.
For example if you copy a text over a text again and again, will give you any clarity of what you had copied but rather will create confusion and dilemma. Similarly, mind also works in similar fashion, you cannot overdo the brain the same things, you need to remove the earlier facts entirely to learn new things.
Also, while learning new things you might think that probably you know that already and you don't pay attention to the new learnings. This is called egoism that develops because of half knowledge thinking that oh it is so easy.
To explain it a better way, we can consider James Watt, who invented that the train can run on steam, definitely nobody knew that it was even possible, we always considered steam as just a source to heaten up the tea kettle, had Watt did not removed the lenses of familiarity, he would not be able make his invention.
Also, one has to understand that sometimes we need to base our new understandings on the previous ones for example when scientist or researchers conducts new experiments, they base it on the earlier facts. Such as, everybody knows that any sort of vehicle runs on a tire but with time we try to make improvements on the tire such as by changing the composition of the tire material or design to apt to the current requirement or circumstances.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
I agree with the fact that in order to learn something new one mus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... probably you know that already and you dont pay attention to the new learnings. Thi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'remove'
Suggestion: remove
...ten up the tea kettle, had Watt did not removed the lenses of familiarity, he would not...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e current requirement or circumstances.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, while, as to, for example, sort of, such as, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 264.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58712121212 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50288802424 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632575757576 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 704.065955056 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4655205051 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.375 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 23.4991977007 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 5.21951772744 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0109173729623 0.243740707755 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00831990582599 0.0831039109588 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220124017471 0.0758088955206 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0069533894584 0.150359130593 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139067789168 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
I agree with the fact that in order to learn something new one mus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... probably you know that already and you dont pay attention to the new learnings. Thi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'remove'
Suggestion: remove
...ten up the tea kettle, had Watt did not removed the lenses of familiarity, he would not...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e current requirement or circumstances.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, while, as to, for example, sort of, such as, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 264.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58712121212 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50288802424 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632575757576 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 704.065955056 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4655205051 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.375 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 23.4991977007 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 5.21951772744 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0109173729623 0.243740707755 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00831990582599 0.0831039109588 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220124017471 0.0758088955206 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0069533894584 0.150359130593 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139067789168 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.