The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number of skateboard users in the plaza. There has also been a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza. Thus, we recommend that the city prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. If skateboarding is prohibited here, we predict that business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels."Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The letter from Central Plaza store owner suggests to prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza to restore it as a shopping arena. We humans always have nature to cover up over own defeats by blaming other external circumstances. Though skate boarding may be one of the factor in the abate of number of shoppers there may be several other intrinsic and extrinsic actors which impact the intensity of shoppers in Central Plaza.
One of the factor may be the increase in a number of modern malls around the area of Central Plaza may have an intense effect on the shops in Central Plaza. As time progresses every business has to adopt itself to suit to the current trends, in failing to do so they may face downfall sometime or the other. These modern malls have ability to allure the customers with their amenities and discounts where as owners at the Central Plaza may not be successful in attracting customers.
Though skateboarding may cause a negative effect among few shoppers, there are also people who visit these areas just to see skaters perform their stunts and enjoy. So, we can't say that removing skateboarding from Central Plaza is directly proportional to number of shoppers visiting.
To conclude, in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result we should answer the following questions:
1. Are there any new malls or shopping alternatives which are open in the past two years near the Central Plaza area?
2. Are the businesses in Central Plaza flexible enough to change in customer needs and attracting customers with modern methods?
3. Does skateboarding only cause negative effect or there are people coming to watch skateboarders perform their stunts which has a positive impact on shops in Central Plaza?
4. Are other factors such as lack of parking area, neatness causing people to move away from PLaza"
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests prohibiting'.
Suggestion: suggests prohibiting
...e letter from Central Plaza store owner suggests to prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza to resto...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...te boarding may be one of the factor in the abate of number of shoppers there may be seve...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 399, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...mers with their amenities and discounts where as owners at the Central Plaza may not be ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... perform their stunts and enjoy. So, we cant say that removing skateboarding from Ce...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, may, so, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98722044728 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65657593658 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552715654952 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.005610557 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.076923077 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.23076923077 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302772766053 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123482700208 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10536810096 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137109828716 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681028876174 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.