The following appeared as a letter to the editor from the owner of a skate shop in Central Plaza.
"Two years ago the city council voted to prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. They claimed that skateboard users were responsible for litter and vandalism that were keeping other visitors from coming to the plaza. In the past two years, however, there has been only a small increase in the number of visitors to Central Plaza, and litter and vandalism are still problematic. Skateboarding is permitted in Monroe Park, however, and there is no problem with litter or vandalism there. In order to restore Central Plaza to its former glory, then, we recommend that the city lift its prohibition on skateboarding in the plaza."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
In the modern world with the high level of improving robots, computers, and other smart machines, the statement that human mind will always surpass the first ones is becoming a hot spot for people. While supporters of the greatness of human mind abilities over machines provide the idea that computers are controlled by human, the opponents of this point of view provide reasonable arguments. In my view, human mind will not stay superior to machines, because it will not be competitive one day.
First of all, each year machines are becoming smarter by improving their abilities and features. Many scientists and researchers are working on making things better and smarter, thus, the steps with which technology is improving are tremendous. In the future, the possibility of reaching the point when machines will be smarter than people is high. For instance, nowadays the area of artificial intelligence is the state of art, the fields of using is broad. One of them is how to use the concept of artificial intelligence for self-improvements of machines, when they will be able to evolve without human participation in this process.
The next aspect which in the next several years will make a gap broader between people mind and machine abilities is the quantity of information. The modern world is characterized by the inconsistent growth of data which people need to know how to consummate and save properly. It is physically impossible for humans to keep all in their minds as it can do a machine in its memory. Having all information in one place and with the development of artificial intelligence, machines will operate it faster and in a more productive way than humans will.
But even now on the current stage of development, humans comparing to machines are not able to perform many large-scale tasks. Is it easy for you to call each single digit in the number of P? The lay person can remember only three or two numbers after the point, at the same time machines and computer are able to keep in their memory not only P, but more difficult numbers. People find their reasons to devote these tasks to machines such as reducing the amount of time on calculating, the low probability of a mistake and etc. Even the best mathematics or physics cannot beat over a computer in calculating tasks.
To draw a line, I advocate that people mind abilities are finite and in the nearest future we will not be able to be good competitors to machines, because they will faster, smarter, and, thus, will overcome us by different parameters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 522, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ating, the low probability of a mistake and etc. Even the best mathematics or physics ca...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, while, for instance, such as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89376443418 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79745034679 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512702078522 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1922008649 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.722222222 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0555555556 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0308737269573 0.243740707755 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0118488731367 0.0831039109588 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0128418042531 0.0758088955206 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0188807169488 0.150359130593 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00880989572884 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.