Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su

Essay topics:

Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Education is a need in the life of every individual and plays an important role in determining the success they might encounter in their lives. Indisputably, any kind of restriction or barricades in the process of education can be shackling and limits one to meet a major disadvantage. Nevertheless, some sense of formal education is always welcomed everywhere for a sense of better education and understanding of the subject. Thus, it not surprising to disagree with the author for the following three reasons.
First of all, having a formal education can reduce the stress placed upon students and make them more confident when burdened with examinations. To illustrate, consider a class with a subject that follows strict class room based learning and never encourage any external data to interfere. The same class is taught another subject which is completely opposite to the previously stated subject and allows the students to explore and promotes a teaching that is free and independent. But, when the students were given tests on both these subjects, the students would most likely to ace the first one where they know what will come and to expect compared to the second, where they do not know the definite structure or the type answers expected. Consequently, students lose their interest in the second subject and might wish for the same pattern as the first subject for better marks and learning.
Adding to this, the formal education places a lot of responsibility upon teachers and students need to heavily depend on their lecturers for guidance in their subjects. This improves the relationship between between the mentor and the students and promotes a smoother occurrence of semester or year. Students are no longer bonded to their techniques of "self-study" where they are completely independent of the lectures given by the teachers but share their workloads with their teachers. This provides a sense of security to students as they are provided with every resource, article, and books needed to qualify the classes by the professors themselves rather than surfing and struggling alone without a proper guidance.
Furthermore, many universities and schools mandate particular courses or teach in the restriction of particular information in every subject. This restriction in data taught to students helps them filter out unnecessary information they would have no use in the future. For example, many universities have stopped their extra practices in basic calculations and allowed their students to bring calculators to the class thus adopting to the new generational technology. Also, rather than teaching the outmoded syllabus sanctioned by the nation, many schools are making more room for contemporary subjects that would bolster the students stance or acceptance in their selected major fields and other upcoming technologies which would be more beneficial to the students. From the above illustration, the consequences of cutting out any unnecessary data that does not provide for the betterment students is proved to be good and needed in this competitive world.
Many might claim that in an unrestricted education students are bound to learn more and are far more likely to be successful. But what they fail to understand is that, though the education or the material is restricted in the formal education, the students would be thorough and highly clear with whatever they are taught in this system. Most times, this type of education covers every speck of data and knowledge that a student would need for a successful career. Unless, more facts are added in support to the claims made by the author, they cannot be taken seriously. In fact acknowledging these statements would be a dishonor to many students who are thriving currently as a result of this system of education.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: between
...ubjects. This improves the relationship between between the mentor and the students and promote...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 627, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...mporary subjects that would bolster the students stance or acceptance in their selected ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 959, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and needed in this competitive world. Many might claim that in an unrestricted...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...nd needed in this competitive world. Many might claim that in an unrestricted education...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, so, thus, for example, in fact, kind of, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3210.0 2235.4752809 144% => OK
No of words: 613.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23654159869 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97582523872 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94937760714 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481239804241 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 996.3 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6459677839 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.565217391 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.652173913 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95652173913 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0975750015235 0.243740707755 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343538916864 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279464073612 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063815577614 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170464233339 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 100.480337079 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: between
...ubjects. This improves the relationship between between the mentor and the students and promote...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 627, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...mporary subjects that would bolster the students stance or acceptance in their selected ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 959, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and needed in this competitive world. Many might claim that in an unrestricted...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...nd needed in this competitive world. Many might claim that in an unrestricted education...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, so, thus, for example, in fact, kind of, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3210.0 2235.4752809 144% => OK
No of words: 613.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23654159869 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97582523872 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94937760714 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481239804241 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 996.3 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6459677839 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.565217391 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.652173913 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95652173913 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0975750015235 0.243740707755 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343538916864 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279464073612 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063815577614 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170464233339 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 100.480337079 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.