All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's schools.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The topic raises a controversial issue of whether parents should be required to volunteer time at schools or not. Indisputably, it is a noble action that could educate children about the benefits and need for volunteering in the society from a young age. Nevertheless, the act of volunteering by parents at their children schools has more drawbacks than benefits. Adding to this, it is not the only method of teaching children about the welfare of volunteering. Thus, It is not unexpected that there is general disagreement regarding the mandatory volunteering of parents in schools.
First of all, I would like to point out that the parents are busy creatures. They run a hectic life with barely any time to spare. This lack of time could be required for their survival to provide with enough earnings to maintain their household. To illustrate, consider a single mother who is working at a restaurant as a waitress from 9 AM to 5 PM. She barely has any time to sleep and fulfil her needs and adding mandatory volunteering would be burdensome. Similarly, consider parents who are doctors. Their work require them to be available at ungodly hours and answer for every emergency they are contacted with. Asking them to spend their time volunteering by cancelling their appointments could be a loss to society. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that the volunteering program was established with no thorough research.
Furthermore, many people argue that volunteering could be a way to bond the children and parents despite their schedules. But, the nature of the volunteering is unknown. The volunteer might be required to clean the school grounds or teach or help with the organization or participate in school activities like debates, discussions and speeches. In all these circumstances there are no instances that would allow the parents to bond with their children. Rather than mandating volunteering and trying to control the free time possessed by the parents, it is advisable to let them approach and spend their time with their children in a way that is deemed comfortable by them.
Admittedly, it is true that parents could form better bond with schools in this way and keep a closer eye on the systematic running of the school. Parents complain that their children never share their school activities or their day to day lifestyle with them. By volunteering, they could observe their children comportment at a safer distance. But this might also distance the children even further as they could claim this action to be a breach of trust. Parenting is patient job where it is required to let them children walk to their parents at their own pace and conditions. This form of forced entry to know about their lives could be interpreted as violation of their privacy and result in pushing them even farther into their shells.
In conclusion, although volunteering is a great activity that should be encouraged, it is best to limit it for other areas. Unless proper guidance is published and necessary consolations are provided, the negative consequences of volunteering by parents in schools cannot be refuted. In fact, abandoning the idea would be a better choice for betterment of both parents and children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...burdensome. Similarly, consider parents who are doctors. Their work require them to be ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2689.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04502814259 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92223143933 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476547842402 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4734317619 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0357142857 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0357142857 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10714285714 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318530205243 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100033827773 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510688205025 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208588855783 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315027200333 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.