Formal educational credentials should be the most important factor in hiring employees.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the above opinion. Support your opinion with reasons and examples.
Should formal educational credentials of a candidate be the decisive factor for his/her hiring? While many recruiters as well as recruitees believe that an exceptional resume is the key to getting a job offer, others believe in jugding a candiate's potential by a personal interview. I strongly believe that the educational credentials do not always justify the knowledge or suitability of a candidate for the job, and therefore it should not be the most important or decisive factor for hiring.
Consider some of the candidates that do not belong to premium colleges or who do not have very high cumulative grade points. However, it is only unjustified to relate their knowledge of job-required skills based on these factors. In many cases, the students do not secure high GPAs that account for their overall scores in all the subjects, but show immence potential and in-depth understanding of the subjects of their interest. When the job requirements consist of such a skill-set, these students can offer best candidature as opposed to someone who is merely good in all the subjects.
Another instance where educational credentials do not represent the actual potential of candidates are the jobs, in which a refined oral communication skill is required. For example, when hiring a salesman or a marketing representive for a company, the academic qualifications do not play as important role as the ability of the person to articulate the company services and products to its current and potential customers. This case also applies when hiring teachers and college professors. Many-a-times, individuals immensly knowledgeable are not able to share or transfer it to their students. On the other hand, a relatively less talented professor can make a subject more interesting by his/her amazing interaction skills.
Contrary to these circumstances, there are however situations in which it is easier and quite essential to disparate candidates based on their educational credentials. Employeers might be receiving hundreds or thousands of applications for the mentioned job openings. In such a case, it becomes quite cumbersome for them, to interview each and every potential candidate. During such a pickle, separating or firstly evaluating their resume turns out be a viable solution. A person with high educational credential is more probable to be skilled in the required areas.
Summing up the above mentioned examples, it can be concluded that educational credentials do not completely represent the skill-set of a candidate. Hence, the hiring employers should also interview their candiates and then make a judicious decision of hiring employees among them. Having said that, educational creadits do represent some of the skills or scholarly attributes of candiates and can be considered for initial references.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... decisive factor for hiring. Consider some of the candidates that do not belong to premiu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'offer the best'.
Suggestion: offer the best
...of such a skill-set, these students can offer best candidature as opposed to someone who i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 334, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...that, educational creadits do represent some of the skills or scholarly attributes of candi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 2260.96107784 105% => OK
No of words: 441.0 441.139720559 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40816326531 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1341871756 2.78398813304 113% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 204.123752495 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 705.55239521 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2137425448 57.8364921388 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.05 23.324526521 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.70786347227 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155392115835 0.218282227539 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05343286005 0.0743258471296 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067356906388 0.0701772020484 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953680671094 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589644656288 0.0628817314937 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.3799401198 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.32208582834 116% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 98.500998004 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.