If the greatness of a nation is measured by the welfare of it's people, then the statement supports a view in which the citizens of a nation and their needs are the priority. This point of view is logical, taking into account that the base of a nation is the people that conforms it and the relations between them. We can imagine the people as the different pieces out of which this complex machine - the nation- is made of. If any piece is defectous, the entire machine will not work propperly.
For example, European nordic countries have focussed their attention in providing solutions to basic problems of their citizens: funding for education, economic help for their citizens, public healthcare, etc. These countries are generally considered as "great countries", where the system works propperly and the people doesn't have serious problems.
The general opinion about these countries differs greatly from other countries in which developments are more relevant in specific aspects, like science, arts or politics. Clear examples are China or Brazil, where some of these developments lead to a very polarized society. Where scientific research is leading, and you can find luxury places, but there is still people in the streets asking for food or money.
To sum up, it is important to defend the importance of each person that is part of a society, and any tendency to give more relevance to small groups should be erradicated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e system works propperly and the people doesnt have serious problems. The general ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
... find luxury places, but there is still people in the streets asking for food or money...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 238.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10924369748 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73425119906 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63025210084 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 704.065955056 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9370003981 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.6 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201034132313 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737116497931 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742080231897 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940574600698 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731287397522 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.