The statement that the general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievement of its rulers, artists or scientist is absolutely right. A nation is called 'nation' because of its collective population, not any individual person. So, a nation's greatness greatly depends on the general welfare of common people.
There are many nation in the world, which is not considered as great just because there common people are not in great condition. For instance, from several decades North Korea' s leader developing nuclear bombs, while his own population is starving and dying. For those reasons, we don't consider a great one. Another such example is, Saudi Arabia, a nation with corrupted leaders, poor environmental conditions, oil-rich country, but general people are suffering and they are on war with Yemen for no good reason.
GDP is the common indicator of a countries greatness in a greater sense. It indicates that the countries population is doing great. A countries welfare largely depends on its health care, law enforcement, development projects, democracy and many other things. Without those such basic needs, a country's welfare can hardly depend on individual rulers, artists or scientists.
The common indication of a nation by the historian is how many countries they colonized. A sizable army and military, as well as technological supremacy, are among the common characteristics of powerful nations. However, this also translates in big military expenses, which is collected from its citizens. The soviet union is an example of that. Because of their former larger military, often they failed to provide basic needs to their citizens, which eventually caused collapses soviet union.
In the last century, Great Britain was renown for their advancement in science. With the help of science, there is an industrial revolution in Britain, which caused nothing but 16-hour mandatory labor, child labor and so on. A scientist can only invent industrial machineries, but can't control internal corruption.
Though a great leader, artist or scientist can bring some great achievements but a nation's greatness only depends on its general welfare.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...s people is a better indication of that nations greatness than are the achievement of i...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ation, not any individual person. So, a nations greatness greatly depends on the genera...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun nation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many nations'.
Suggestion: many nations
... welfare of common people. There are many nation in the world, which is not considered a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'nations'?
Suggestion: nations
...are of common people. There are many nation in the world, which is not considered a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...arving and dying. For those reasons, we dont consider a great one. Another such exam...
^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...on. GDP is the common indicator of a countries greatness in a greater sense. It indica...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... a greater sense. It indicates that the countries population is doing great. A countries ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 282, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...only invent industrial machineries, but cant control internal corruption. Though ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...can bring some great achievements but a nations greatness only depends on its general w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40345821326 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84226129787 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564841498559 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4580969899 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.35 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294604656881 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896492843175 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898045480541 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156144502454 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999103659069 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.