gh

Essay topics:

gh

I believe all faculties of colleges and universities should spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach because not only it will make them better at teaching but also students will be benefited from this. Moreover, it will help the faculties to shape the curriculum of their courses according to the ever changing work field.

First, the faculties of colleges and universities are always trying to improve themselves through research, seminar, workshop etc. Working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach will be one of the most effective medias for improving themselves because they will apply their theoretical knowledge in practical life. Besides if they are working in a new theory, they can test them in those conditions.

Second, since students will take those professions after completing their courses, it will be beneficial to them if faculties experience those jobs. Moreover, since faculties will be able to identify if the students need any new skill to perform better in those position, they can teach those skills in their courses.

Some may argue that since the faculties have already huge work load, it will be difficult to implement this rule. Though the argument is true, it will not be impossible to implement this rule because the faculties will not spend six months or one year in those jobs, one or two months period will be enough for the faculties which can be managed during holidays.

In conclusion, working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses faculties teach will be beneficial for both the students and faculties. For these reasons, all faculties of colleges and universities should spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.

Votes
Average: 1.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... etc. Working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses t...
^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...heoretical knowledge in practical life. Besides if they are working in a new theory, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...se skills in their courses. Some may argue that since the faculties have already h...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udents and faculties. For these reasons, all faculties of colleges and universiti...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, as for, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 295.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24406779661 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65541675636 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457627118644 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3094815811 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.636363636 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.243740707755 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0831039109588 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150359130593 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 100.480337079 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.