Government funding for purely scientific endeavors, such as space exploration, should be reduced in order to direct more funding toward humanitarian science projects.
The speaker states that funding for purely scientific endeavors, such as space exploration, should be reduced in order to direct more funding toward humanitarian science projects. Purely scientific endeavor’s has resulted in increase of our knowledge of the world, because of which we are able to build things that will help advance as species. Hence, I disagree with the author that funding for purely scientific endeavors should be reduced to direct more funding towards humanitarian science project.
We all remember when former president John F Kennedy rallied the whole country for the moon exploration program. This project was then funded by the government, which was undertaken by NASA. In order to make this project successful scientist at NASA invented many things such as welcro, which are commonly used today. Through probes send by Chandrayan-1, we came to know that there is water on moon. This knowledge about various resources came to be known to us only because of scientific endeavors. There are even plans by certain companies to extract resources from various asteroids in the future. This resource which we will obtain in future would never have been possible if scientific endeavors were not undertaken.
Scientific endeavors not only helps us collect knowledge about the world, it also helps create a sense of interest amongst the younger generation, who then out of curiosity, will undertake even more advance projects. For example, Elon Musk, who runs a space exploration company SpaceX, has often attributed his inspiration for such endeavors to astronaut such as Neil Armstrong. Also such scientific endeavors has resulted in creation of many jobs which have in turn has been profitable for economy.
But, ofcourse, in case of emergency or a natural disaster funding for such scientific endeavors would be reduced and indeed rightly so. During such a tribulation, it is important to direct resources to those in need. However, if there is no such emergency, it would be foolish on our part to stop such scientific endeavors which has resulted in advancement of the entire human species.
To sum up, scientific funding should be reduced only in case of exigency. However if there is no such difficult situation then there should be no reduction in funding for scientific endeavors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rs to astronaut such as Neil Armstrong. Also such scientific endeavors has resulted ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich have in turn has been profitable for economy. But, ofcourse, in case of em...
^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ld be reduced only in case of exigency. However if there is no such difficult situation...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25067385445 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80374762046 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3234450847 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484721432352 0.243740707755 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165303012072 0.0831039109588 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.214833338851 0.0758088955206 283% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303728856304 0.150359130593 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.215168230137 0.0667264976115 322% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.