Government funding for purely scientific endeavors, such as space exploration, should be reduced in order to direct more funding toward humanitarian science projects.
Technology has taken us sky high, literally. Space exploration is an example of that. People have reached moon and studied the farthest of farthest galaxies with the help of space technology. It takes adroit human resource and mammoth amount of funding behind a single space exploration and all these funding come from government bodies who gets it from taxes paid by the people of the country. Sure, it consumes major chunk of the taxes we have paid and it does put the humanitarian science projects such as building better infrastructure, repairing the roads to a stake but space research is salubrious in the long run.
For instance, a lot of man-made satellites revolve around the earth which makes our day-to-day task effortless. Today, if we are lost in an unknown city, all we need to do is turn on the GPS navigation system on our mobile and our phone will connect itself to the nearest satellite which will guide us to the desired location. Not just that, it helps us connects to our loved ones who are miles away from us through a telephone call.Our voice simply gets converted into electrical signals and reaches the nearest satellite which would get transferred to a location which is miles away from us.
When it comes to spying, satellite play a prominent role. It helps us to understand the movement of enemy country which eventually assist us in preparing for war beforehand. Imagine the number of attacks or harms an enemy country could do had we not been analyzing their movements?
Scientists these days also carry forward their research on long term planning such as building habitable environment on another planet in case earth is not safe in the near future. Sure these are not the problems we face today or in the coming years but we can't limit our thinking to the problems faced in next coming decade or two.
Yes, i do agree that copious amount of money is invested in space exploration but the returns is as huge as the investment. These returns indirectly helps in humanitarian science projects. Today, government won't be able to build good roads or even warm people of that upcoming storm had expensive satellite not been hovering around earth and predicting the climate change. At the same time it should not be such that government spend superfluous amount of its fund on space exploration and save an inconsiderable amount for humanitarian projects. It should plan it's budget properly and it should also keep in mind how developed or underdeveloped our country is. Putting gargantuan amount of money in space exploration by a developing country would be bad for its economic growth.
Hence, based on cogent budget carried out for the future government should accordingly invest in space and humanitarian work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the farthest'.
Suggestion: of the farthest
...e reached moon and studied the farthest of farthest galaxies with the help of space technol...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... it helps us connects to our loved ones who are miles away from us through a telephone ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Our
...s away from us through a telephone call.Our voice simply gets converted into electr...
^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st satellite which would get transferred to a location which is miles away from u...
^^
Line 6, column 257, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ace today or in the coming years but we cant limit our thinking to the problems face...
^^^^
Line 8, column 6, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... in next coming decade or two. Yes, i do agree that copious amount of money i...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 465.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9247311828 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70839361976 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535483870968 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0523545819 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189118119737 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606810175341 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730058768075 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989961601984 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895246157507 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.