Claim: In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters
Author claims that government should minimally interfere in private business matters of small companies with an intention to support and help them burgeon. Small business have hard time surviving against giant MNCs. To top it all, tax policies and paper work done to form a business makes it arduous. Hence, i agree that minimal support from government to help small business grow would benefit not only the small companies but also the economy of the country.
One of the major problem a small business face is competing against giant MNCs. Take example of Walmart and any small company. When a Walmart opens in an area, it lures a great deal of crowd by offering discounts or selling goods at a price cheaper than current market rate which Walmart could afford because they import goods in bulk unlike small companies. Not just that, big companies have massive marketing team which could help publicize the company as well as their goods. A small company is deprived of such privileges. Stringent tax policies, tedious paper work to set up a business and minimal interest shown by investors to invest in small companies exacerbates the matter. Eventually, due to paucity of customers, these companies go out of business.
What government could do to support businesses in their rudimentary stage is that, it could implement certain policies which could directly benefit these companies. Policies such as alleviating the paper work, exempting tax policies for companies which are just few years old and introducing loan schemes exclusively for start-ups. It could also provide a common platform for direct interaction between companies and investors or organize a competition at national level only for small business and whoever comes up with the best business model is awarded with certain price. This could motivate small business to think innovative. By limiting the multiplication of MNCs would not only cut down competition for small business but also preclude money to go out of country.
Such minimal changes would not only benefit small business to burgeon but also help in economic growth. When citizens start buying indigenous goods, it assuages the burden on importing goods from outside. Small companies when make it big could attract foreign investors. Skilled labors would not be outsourced to other countries in search of jobs. Expansion in business also means expansion in technology and research which could help in making the country technologically advanced and one of the finest example of such expansion is companies like Google, Microsoft and Apple. These companies were once start-ups formed mostly in garages but today they have their mark in most of the countries in the world with world-class office infrastructure and mammoth revenue generated every year.
All in all, government support in expansion of small business would eventually yield satisfactory returns for the country and increase the standard of living as well as job vacancies for citizens. Hence government should support small business thrive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...orm a business makes it arduous. Hence, i agree that minimal support from governm...
^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'would' requires base form of the verb: 'cut'
Suggestion: cut
...e multiplication of MNCs would not only cut down competition for small business but...
^^^
Line 3, column 773, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so preclude money to go out of country. Such minimal changes would not only bene...
^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... as well as job vacancies for citizens. Hence government should support small busines...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2557.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 485.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27216494845 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66643779795 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513402061856 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 775.8 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.262059832 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.227272727 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0454545455 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.13636363636 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32306137664 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118353445468 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120644860684 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218876978486 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115406781153 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.