Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

It is at most importance that one should be able to recognize the judgement they make in order carry out the task in day to day life. It is true that government officials are appointed to serve the people, but at the same time it's is also equally important to maintain balance in the judgement they make to serve the people. As the claim suggest that the government officials should reply on their judgment rather than blindly following the what the people say they need to be served.
Firstly, serving people can be divided into two sub-parts. The one who actually need help other who have everything that the another person doesn't have still need more which is nothing but excessive greed. At this point in time, it’s the judgment of the officials that might get the right help to the right person/group in need. If the officials help the person/group that has much more than the other, it will be total discremenation among the two groups. To have the keen understanding who, when and how to help/serve is primarily important in this case.
Moving forward, if people get to know that the officials listen to whatever they say, they might take undue advantage of this situation. Let us consider an example, wherein there a two villages Village A has a limited water supply only in the form of well and small ponds which is only available 8 months in a year, where as the other Village Bi s settled on the bank of a river that has water 12 months a year, the member of the Village A & B both wish to get the waterbody development scheme where in the government provides a certain amount to maintain water reverse. The village B, makes a plausible statement indicating that they are in the need of the scheme funds to maintain water reverse, in this case the judgement of the officials will take an important role in order to help the people of Village A, as the water supply is not sufficient of the village A. Providing the funds to village A will be a goods decision by the officials.
It's is really important to understand the need of the people, it will be naïve and vague to make a biased decision based on unquestioningly carrying out the decision, as we saw in the above example. As questioning the need for the particular resource can help understand the officials the true needy, it will definielty provide the right help and server the right group of people.
In conclusion, I totally agree with the claims, as the government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. As discussed, providing the resource/help without have the true knowledge who the real needful is not a professional way of getting things done. It is important to understand the need of the people and serve the needy or else there are some people to take undue advantage of the situation, which might hold the back the growth of the other.

Votes

Essay Categories

GMAT/GRE Issue Task

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...udgement they make to serve the people. As the claim suggest that the government o...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the people say they need to be served. Firstly, serving people can be divided i...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...have everything that the another person doesnt have still need more which is nothing b...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...at the another person doesnt have still need more which is nothing but excessive gre...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e is primarily important in this case. Moving forward, if people get to know th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...h is only available 8 months in a year, where as the other Village Bi s settled on the b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be a goods decision by the officials. Its is really important to understand th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and server the right group of people. In conclusion, I totally agree with the ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, really, so, still, well, in conclusion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2392.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 515.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64466019417 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63802048783 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438834951456 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.588644358 60.3974514979 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.705882353 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2941176471 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232348211718 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898840897862 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105778338907 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151442465482 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965202471219 0.0667264976115 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, really, so, still, well, in conclusion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments