Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Government officials have been elected by the people and for the people. These elected officials have been elected so, as the people have put their faith and expectations in them in order to improve the lives of the citizens. Hence, I mostly agree with the stated prompt that the government officials must rely more on their wit and judgement while making the important decisions.
Every election season, candidates representative of multiple parties participate in the elections from various constituencies, maintaining their purpose and motivation. While, we as the common people, assess these candidates and their flowery speech and based on our rightful judgement we pick the person who aligns the most with our opinion of who would be better able to promote development? Or who would do the work more diligently than being involved in dubious schemes. Considering these thoughts that precipitate towards the election of the respective candidate, this official must realise the level of responsibility and trust enforced upon him or her. He or she must hence be a confident enough while making the toughest decisions despite the crowd going the opposite way.
Further, an official who is a mere puppet carrying out the tasks required of him would serve no use to the nation. If he or she carries out the duties as requested by another corrupt official or is a blind follower of his people's demands, the results could turn out catastrophic. FOr example, if the people of a constituency demand free electricity and all of the allotted budget is spent on fulfilling this one demand, it would be foolhardy of the official to do so. This act could result in the constituency missing out on other quintessential resources for its development.
I do concede that despite having the power to make the most crucial decisions that would have a tremendous impact on the country and it’s citizens, the official must tread carefully. He or she definitely absorb in the opinions of the people and his peers before making any necessary decision. However, the final judgement to be made is at his sole discretion. He or she has been elected to the party for this very purpose - to be able to make the tough decisions for the betterment of the nation and hence must believe in oneself to carry out the task.
Hence, in conclusion, I believe that government officials must rely on their judgements as their duty demands their decision making skills. However, they mustn't "unquestionably" carry out the demands of the people but rather consider all the view points before making his or her call.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...onstituency demand free electricity and all of the allotted budget is spent on fulfilling ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'absorbs'.
Suggestion: absorbs
...t tread carefully. He or she definitely absorb in the opinions of the people and his p...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: mustn't
...r decision making skills. However, they mustnt 'unquestionably' carry out th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0464037123 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94666288283 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517401392111 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.687336075 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9444444444 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15480605628 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548588174239 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434960330507 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100348170372 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490694897281 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.