Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Government officials should rely mostly on their own judgement. They need not unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve but they have to make their own judgement taking into account the will of the people they serve.
Firstly, if there is an emergency situation like a war in any country and government has decided to impose curfew in the country, then the government officials need not ask the opinion of the people in their country regarding the imposition of the curfew. Because if majority of the population are against the imposition of the curfew in the country, then it becomes a problem if the government officials withdraw curfew based on the will of the majority of the population. In this case, adopting the recommendation made by the author is advantageous because curfew is mainly meant to restore the cordial relationships between the people and bring peace in the country soon.
Secondly, if the government decides to provide reservation for the minority group people in many fields like education, politics, entertainment, then government officials should rely on their own judgemnet rather than knowing the opinion of each and every person in the country. Because, there is a possibility that the country has only few people belong to minority category and majority of the population oppose the idea of the reservation. There is also possibility that only few people oppose the idea of the reservation. It would become a problem if government officials favor the people who oppose the idea of reservation without asking any questions to them regarding why they do not want the reservation system to be implemented in their country. In this case, adopting the recommendation made by the author is advantageous.
Thirdly, if the government decides to increase taxes on all goods without asking the opinion of the people in their own country, then the recommendation would be disadvantegous. However, if the government conducts a survey to know the opinion of the people regarding how much increase in taxes is acceptable and affordable by the people in the country, then the government can impose fair amount of increase in the taxes on the goods taking into account the opinions of all the people in their country.
Government officials should rely on their own judgement rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. However, they have to consider the will of the people they serve before their making their own judgement to make a fair juddgement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... country, then the government can impose fair amount of increase in the taxes on ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 12.9106741573 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09420289855 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91494658274 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.36231884058 0.4932671777 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.4433156585 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.642857143 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287163139158 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131762294448 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114426534569 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207750390143 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114505448115 0.0667264976115 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.