Government should place, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development
P#1
Whether the government should restrict the scientific research? It depends on whether it do good to the maintenance of the stability of society and can promote the quality of life of citizens live in the country. From my perspective，I hold the view that restriction to scientific research from government is of huge necessity. The reasons are as follow:
P#2
Firstly, if let scientific research develop freely, severe moral problems will occur, which threaten the security of society. For example, assume that it is allowed to use clone technology on human beings, then we need to answer the question that if those cloned people has the equal rights to humans who are nature bore, which whatever the answer is would bring ethical crisis of human life. Also, we cannot be sure about whether the cloned people will occupy too much resource of the society, which gives burden to the living of nature bore people and stimulate the contradiction between cloned people and nature bore people, resulting to an unstable society.
P#3
What’s more, if the scientific researches are conducted in selfish purposes, it would be more horrible. A typical example is that many IT companies leak the data of the users to gain unbelievable illegal profit, which leads to the unsafe of privacy and frequent internet fraud. From above we can know that if we do not give the scientific institution a range of research, then they would reach the forbidden zone and do harm to people who use their technology.
P#4
As we have discussed above, it is of great need for government to restrict the scientific research, which could protect the profit of citizens and maintain the society in a well-ordered situation, so I am greatly convinced that government should place restriction on scientific research.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...t is of huge necessity. The reasons are as follow: P#2 Firstly, if let scientific resea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 302, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...d people has the equal rights to humans who are nature bore, which whatever the answer ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, then, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 297.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06397306397 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74320077553 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56228956229 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3260120854 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.4 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309966864952 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154222788693 0.0831039109588 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185849222174 0.0758088955206 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215344239474 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145512220625 0.0667264976115 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.