Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reason

Essay topics:

Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Government officials are the individuals whose primary role is to establish relationship between public and government, and implement the laws, policies promulgated or sanctioned by the government. The author claims that government official should solely make their judgement rather than doing according to the demand of people . I mostly agree with the claim, however, i do concede that there are some cases in which government officials should rely on the public will.
First of all, government officials are people who are, in most of the cases, motivated to serve their country at any cost. They will carry out any action that is in the benefit of nation and ultimately the people of nation. Government officials are generally highly educated, experienced, adept at making right decision at right time, unswerving and bold. For instance, Kulman Ghising, former managing director of electricity board of Nepal had eradicated the issue of loadshedding in his short tenure. He just followed his principles and neglected the opinions and criticisms of other people, ultimately, he did in just two years, what other officials could not. Has he listened to the interests of people they serve, there would be chances that they ask to do something on their favor. Had this been the case, would the problem of electricity be eradicated?
Secondly, there are several situations in which public are mass motivated to get a particular work done by some so called influential people of the society. They encourage people to follow on their paths and hinder some positive changes. In scenarios like this, if a government official cannot rely on this decision then a blunder is of high possibility. For instance, while bidding a tender for highway project in Rajsthan, India, a contractor influenced local people and threatened the officials involved in bidding process. In that scenario, a government officer Vishal Ayer, took a stand and retaliated against that contractor. This stand by Mr. Ayer led to highway development in rajsthan in short period of time. Had the contract gone to the former contractor, the changes that can be observed now would not be possible .
Thirdly, in some cases where people are more accustomed or knowledgeble about particular subject matter, relying on those people is the best choice a government individual can make. For instance, while a government official should take decisions or make judgements pertaining to political conditions, it is in the best interest of him to take suggestion from some a individual slaked in politics. This reduces the chances of making errors on political grounds. Additionally, government officials are no omniscient they lack some of the traits needed for some peculiar conditions. These voids can be fulfilled by judiciously understanding people and garnering information pertaining to that subject matter.
In conclusion, the benefits offered by a government officials relying on their own judgements outweighs the benefits offered by carrying out the will of public. So, i mostly agree with the authors claim that government should rely on their own judgements rather than following the footsteps suggested by the public.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... doing according to the demand of people . I mostly agree with the claim, however,...
^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...I mostly agree with the claim, however, i do concede that there are some cases in...
^
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...of all, government officials are people who are, in most of the cases, motivated to ser...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ighway development in rajsthan in short period of time. Had the contract gone to the former co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 825, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...an be observed now would not be possible . Thirdly, in some cases where people ar...
^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...est of him to take suggestion from some a individual slaked in politics. This red...
^
Line 4, column 524, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...t officials are no omniscient they lack some of the traits needed for some peculiar conditi...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, while, for instance, in conclusion, in short, first of all, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2682.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 505.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31089108911 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90034736365 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518811881188 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 830.7 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7071823029 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0416666667 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70833333333 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258797621695 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749476266185 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708836579109 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163683863311 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710125757494 0.0667264976115 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.