Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi

Essay topics:

Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Judgement on a particular issue with accuracy to acceptable limits requires critical understanding and logical background of that particular issue. An expert is the one who has through understanding of the particular field, and can provide some insights on it. The author asserts that critical judgement on any issue ,to be valid, requires expert from that particular field of interest. I mostly agree with the authors assertion for two reasons mentioned below. However, i do concede that in some cases anyone outside the field may provide a different perspective.
First of all, an expert: individual working in a particular field for a long time, has thorough understanding of the field on which the issue is based on and can point out the major inconsistencies which if eliminated by any means can prove to be fruitful. For instance; A scientist working on the field of astronomy can provide better insights about the solar system, life on mars, and other issues pertaining to the space outside world. Additionally, A programmer working on identifying bugs on software can detect issues with the program and can suggest a alternative way out of that. Experts of those particular field can eliminate the alternative possibilities and can provide a critical judgement after through analysis of the subject matter. They can present all their findings logically which can convince most of the people and bring about the change in the way people perceive those issues.
Secondly, Experts have proper understanding of the extremes of their fields, and can detect out erroneous attributions at their first glance. They mostly have developed intution which leads to common mistake or issues readily pointed out, whereas, if given a chance to any person outside the field may not be able to critically analyze the issue. He/she thus cannot provide a appropriate judgement with logical reasoning. For instance, a painter, expert in a modern art can readily point out issues in the painting, whereas, a common layman may not be able to comprehend the art in first place. So, the layman has tendency for erroneous judgement. Additionally, a expert at writing literature, say novel, may have good insights about writing techniques and can potentially judge a piece of writing critically than a normal scientists or any other not an expert on that particular field. In cases like these, experts can be a essential assets to have critical judgement on any issues and bring about significant change.
However, the case may not be exclusively correct, and in some cases, an individual from outside a particular field can provide profound insights or alternative vision on particular issue. In other words, the person outside can provide a different angle or perspective that may prove to be fruitful. For instance, a fallacy associated with the experiment by a scientist working in the field of physics can be pointed by another working in a different field and is unaware about that.
In conclusion, a expert has better understanding on particular issue than a normal man, so the critical judgement by proper analysis of the issue, provided by expert generally outweighs the analysis and judgement of a layman. So, i mostly agree with the authors proposition, that a expert can provide a better critical judgement.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rts that critical judgement on any issue ,to be valid, requires expert from that p...
^^
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ld of interest. I mostly agree with the authors assertion for two reasons mentioned bel...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 472, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...r two reasons mentioned below. However, i do concede that in some cases anyone ou...
^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...int out the major inconsistencies which if eliminated by any means can prove to be...
^^
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...issues with the program and can suggest a alternative way out of that. Experts of...
^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...first glance. They mostly have developed intution which leads to common mistake o...
^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e the issue. He/she thus cannot provide a appropriate judgement with logical reas...
^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... for erroneous judgement. Additionally, a expert at writing literature, say novel...
^
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'scientist'?
Suggestion: scientist
...ece of writing critically than a normal scientists or any other not an expert on that part...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 924, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ld. In cases like these, experts can be a essential assets to have critical judge...
^
Line 3, column 936, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'asset'?
Suggestion: asset
... like these, experts can be a essential assets to have critical judgement on any issue...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...is unaware about that. In conclusion, a expert has better understanding on part...
^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...gree with the authors proposition, that a expert can provide a better critical ju...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in other words, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2769.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15642458101 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90611759156 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.396648044693 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 884.7 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8303264085 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.863636364 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4090909091 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31818181818 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196858543707 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743566270011 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551010769723 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129385688999 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281655355273 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.