The statement contends that Governments should focus primarily on solving the immediate problems of the present than trying to solve the problems of the future, which might prove to be mere predictions. I agree insofar as the future is unpredictable and investing time in solving the anticipated problems of the future, neglecting the present ones might sound unjust to many. Along with this assertion, some problems that are inevitable to occur in near future should be given proportionate focus and efforts to eradicate them.
In today's fast running world, it is of no surprise that a nation faces problems frequently. However, the problems faced might be approved or disproved by the majority. For instance, a metro project running on a great scale causes a delay due to lack of manpower. Because of the construction of metro lines, there is always a huge queue and frequent deadlocks on the crossroads. This problem is faced by the majority of citizens traveling for work or other purposes.
Additionally, Governments should primarily focus to resolve the problems taking into consideration the current scenario as that may prove more beneficial to society. For instance, the dearth of electricity in rural areas affects education, household and daily ventures of the citizens on an extreme scale. In addition to this, there is even water shortage in a few of those areas. Such problems needs immediate attention as they could cause losses of bucolics on a great extent, if not solved.
Conversely, a few anticipated problems of the future might be more pressing in comparison to the present ones.
To sum up, Government has to solve problems faced by its nation, today and tomorrow as well. When it comes to where to keep its focus majorly: It should maintain a proper balance by resolving the acute and pressing problems faced by the majority of the populace and then attempt to solve the remaining difficulties.
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villag83
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.50
- "Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just co69
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo16
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'watered'.
...ale. In addition to this, there is even water shortage in a few of those areas. Such ...
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START
Message: You should probably use 'need'.
... in a few of those areas. Such problems needs immediate attention as they could cause...
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ng in comparison to the present ones. To sum up, Government has to solve probl...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, may, so, then, well, as to, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11075949367 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84285557707 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54746835443 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9023632142 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459383688586 0.243740707755 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137721983228 0.0831039109588 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138358907467 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23144499693 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142719852074 0.0667264976115 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.