Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Making a choice between the solution of urgent problems and the preparation of future matters has always been a controversial issue to both individual and social identity. The argument is stating that the government should focus on the immediate problems of today. However, it is quite complicated problem to just nod one’s head and accept the proponents’ request. Governments should decide its policy based on two things - urgency and importance.
The partisans of the argument contend that the most important aspect of the policy is how much the problem which will be solved by approving the policy is urgent. For example, when the hurricane struck the nation, it is the nation’s number one duty to bring the refugees from the hell and provide them a proper shelter and food, using all the energy to repair the facilities of the area. however, imagine that the nation’s economy growing rate is slowly attenuating simultaneously. Economy problem won’t be on the surface because the economy growing rate itself is still above zero. Still, it is the anticipated problems of the future that the followers speak out loud that it is less important than saving people of devastated area which may be more important because when the nation’s economy go downward, there would be insufficient money to support them. Just focusing on everyday problems which are right beneath the nose would produce a shortsighted government. The urgency is not the only estimation points on decision making.
On the other hand, the opponents of the statement protest that governments should be trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. My point saying no the proponents doesn’t mean the government should only estimate the possibility of the effect that the anticipated problems of the future will bring and establish the policy based on the estimation. It would be hilarious if the government is building factories that will bring a huge profit 10 years later when the population is starving today. The wise government will consume their budget on agricultural industries.
It is important to the government to determine the hierarchy about the importance and urgency of problem at the state of policy planning. By quantifying about how urgent the problem is at the same level with how important the problem which is predicted is and evaluating the balance, the government should decide on which one they should do first or which side that the government should give more weight as the government approve the policies at the same time.
Either extremism is not a best way. Setting tranquility as a motto of the government will bring flourish and happy nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...y to repair the facilities of the area. however, imagine that the nation's economy...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1055, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y estimation points on decision making. On the other hand, the opponents of the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... approve the policies at the same time. Either extremism is not a best way. Sett...
^^^^
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... same time. Either extremism is not a best way. Setting tranquility as a mott...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, still, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19540229885 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88515245055 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498850574713 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9522568154 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.947368421 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8947368421 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47368421053 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343970885912 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107661562267 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121355910657 0.0758088955206 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181340765144 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935462970049 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.