Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y

Essay topics:

Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

The prompt supports the idea that - Government should focus on solving the immemdiate problems rather than solving the anticipated problems of the future. For some obvious reason I would like to be "mostly agree" with statement. Hereby, I am elaborating certain points to defense of my position.

First of all - although it is the most urgent duties of a Government to solve it contemporary problems; better if the solutions of those problems incorporate the same for those problems - likely to be appear in future. It is because in most of the countries the government are selected by their people or by the laws or by the respective system - but the power of thes egovernment are valid for only a certain period of time. Now, if a government is much more vigilant in solving the future problems rather than recent problems then it stands good chance that it might risk its responsibilities to be done properly. If the duties or the facilities are not served properly for which people has elected the government or their king then their is hardly any chance of people being satisfied with their auhtority. So, people will start to lampoon their government; in worst cases war, civil war, revolts and so on. Consequently, the government might go to the history as one of the failed ones.

Also from our common sense we can easily predict that - most problems, to be occurred in the future are mostly related with the present ones. In fact, most severe problems that require long term solution and huge cumulative efforts are to be thought from the heyday of the government ascends in its power. For example - many developing countries are devoid of women education. Many people are not interested enough to educate their girls. As a result, the education rate for women are decreasing day by day on those countries. Pathetic is that - if it continues to decline in such a way then there is alittle chacne that the overall education level of those countries will go down as well as hardly an uneducated mother will likely to send her children to school leaving the easy money earning opportunites. Now, to solve this type of problems that require huge efforts - are not to be solved in one days or two. In order to solve this type of tremendous problems the government should focus on dissolving the recent problems releted to that far lurking problems. Similarly - if the authority are vigilant enough regarding the future problems, it will mandate women education in its country which in turn will result in a educated nation after a long period of time. What it signifies is that - sometimes to solve a far reacher and far looming pronlem the government msut take on account of the recent problems.

However, it can be said that - a better authority will always look for solutions that will also resolve the future as well as contemporary problems. Yes, it should. It will always be better if a government comes with such a solution that can solve today's and also the future problems. But what if it does not. In those cases, it will be better for a government to mark on the problems that are looming nearer in order to maintain its reputation as well as for the welfare of its people.

Looking at all the aforementioned issues, it can be safely said that government should address the recent problems rather than the far looming ones.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...or those problems - likely to be appear in future. It is because in most of the countries...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...government are valid for only a certain period of time. Now, if a government is much more vigi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ected the government or their king then their is hardly any chance of people being sa...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e history as one of the failed ones. Also from our common sense we can easily pre...
^^^^
Line 5, column 897, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one day', 'a day', or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: one day; a day; days
... huge efforts - are not to be solved in one days or two. In order to solve this type of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1065, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...s releted to that far lurking problems. Similarly - if the authority are vigilant enough ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1221, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ts country which in turn will result in a educated nation after a long period of ...
^
Line 5, column 1252, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...esult in a educated nation after a long period of time. What it signifies is that - sometimes ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, regarding, similarly, so, then, well, as for, for example, in fact, as a result, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2774.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 576.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81597222222 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89897948557 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66583808752 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434027777778 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 873.9 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.889744792 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.96 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.04 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.24 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251362435427 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777574976602 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921657359577 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16716110241 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551472834118 0.0667264976115 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.