In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The prompt supports the idea that - in the field of inquiry the beginner will always have the upper hand than the expert in terms of important contributions. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly disagree" with the statement given and thereby I am obliged to elaborate a few points in defense of my position.
To begin with - it can be overtly concluded that, if a beginner is about to contribute more than an expert in the field of inquiry then why should we need even an expert for the purpose? It is as simple as it. However, there are always go certain points for the logical remarking. For example - if a beginner makes the initial step to investigate then what is the probability and also with how much information can he derive if he is not knowledgable enough in that field? There he might toil day and night with a little chance of success if he is devoid of proper system or any kind of impeccable ability. It can simply and logically remark that - comparing an expert with a beginner for a certain field, the expert will always have the upper hand. So, if the statement is to be judged based on solely on the universal fact, then it can not be true that a beginner will contribute more than an expert in the field of investigation.
But, the prompt incites a riddle here. The term "beginner" mentioned can be of two significance. Firstly, the author might the beginner as a novice. He or she might consider the individual as a neophyte in the field of inquiry and ascertain that individual has more chance of contributing to the investigation than an expert. And secondly, the author might consider the term "beginner" as the one who has started the inquiry; irrespective of him or her being an expert or a novice. The question arises here - if the beginner is an expert than he might stand good chance of contributing to the investigation than the later one. On the other-hand, if the beginner is a novice one then the previously mentioned reasons can simply be applied here. Now, for making the debate more limpid, for time being we consider the beginner individual as an expert. So, here we stand the face-off between two experts; one who has started the inquiry and the other one who came later in scheme. Similarly two cases can be arrived here also. Firstly if the earlier one is savvy enough to point out the issues and smart enough to act than he will contribute more than the later one (expert) to the case. However, the vice-verca will also true. So, it is actually a little bit vogue whom will contribute more to the case or inquiry if both the persons; attached to the inquiry are experts.
Apart from that - if the case is similar like the first one; the callow one vs the expert, then some might revered that - as the beginner will have earlier access to the investigation so he or she will contribute more than the expert who had access to the case lately. But the laymen are missing a point here. That is to say - they have to be very clear about the contribution. If they are taking the unnecessary gloat of information; having little significance to the inquiry is some kind of "contribution" - then yes the expert might not withstand that idiocracy. The vital contribution does not depend on the time of access to the inquiry rather depend more on the individual critical thinking and relating the case to the circumstances; for which an expert obviously have better chance than a beginner one. The beginner may have gained plenty of information but those will not be of any use if those are not puzzled out properly and related to the case incentive; the speciality of an expert.
So, looking at all the points and references mentioned above, it might not be a bad idea to say that - though a beginner might have gained plenty of information regarding a case or a certain inquiry by early access, but an expert contribute more to that case because of his or her exquisite acuteness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 43 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | nigarsafarova | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Bidusik47 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 50 | view |
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 66
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species despite the expense to humans in effort time and financial well being Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money an 66
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo 58
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 998, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...the other one who came later in scheme. Similarly two cases can be arrived here also. Fir...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1038, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...Similarly two cases can be arrived here also. Firstly if the earlier one is savvy en...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1264, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ca will also true. So, it is actually a little bit vogue whom will contribute more to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, apart from, for example, kind of, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3267.0 2235.4752809 146% => OK
No of words: 701.0 442.535393258 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6604850214 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.14552277128 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86548393092 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.379457917261 0.4932671777 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1067.4 704.065955056 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.2375403712 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.655172414 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1724137931 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226591052917 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697345787896 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541837196074 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148898493133 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447293288279 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.