With the development of society, some people argue that governments should pay more attention to immediate problems such as poverty and safety instead of focusing on anticipated issues of the future. While it may seems reasonable for governments to regard immediate problems as important, I believe that political leaders should also be careful and try to solve problems that may appeared in the future for a few reasons.
On the one hand, it is obviously significant to try to solve problems on the horizon. Because if these problems are not solved, the society would be more unstable and face more problems rose from the original ones. For example, in many developing countries, there are a large number of people unable to feed themselves and earn enough money to pay for housing, food and clothes. If the poverty problem remain unsolved, there would be an increase in crime and lack of work force in the job market which may make the economy worse. As a result, governments must pay more attention to these immediate problems of today and invest funding in addressing these problems.
On the other hand, there are also some implicit problems and dangers in the society that may deteriorate the livelihood of residents in the future. Take the global warming as an example. If the industries keep using coal and other resources to gain energy, the earth would be warmer in the future. Changing the resources used might not be an immediate issue because the costs spent to buy this kind of resource is still cheap and the trend of global warming may seem moderate. But if governments don’t use policies to bound the using of coal and ignore the anticipated problem, people would face more significant problems in the future, such as extreme weather, food insufficiency and so on. In that case, governments ought to try to solve problems that may appear in the future to avoid other social problems.
In addition, in areas like technology and science, maybe some people regard these problems as long-term and believe that government should pay more money to build other infrastructure such as hospitals. But in fact, the development of the human and society can’t continue without technology progress. If the government ignore developing technology, the country may lose the chance to attract more talented workers, lose in the competition between nations and even lose in a war in the future. The outcome may lead to the loss of the country’s good reputation and political power in the future. Thus, governments should still pay attention to these significant areas.
In conclusion, while it is true that some essential and immediate problems need to be solved and given enough funding, I argue that government should still pay attention to implicit problems that may rise more related problems in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...in many developing countries, there are a large number of people unable to feed themselves and ea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2362.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03624733475 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6801799051 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443496801706 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 745.2 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4749809152 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.315789474 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6842105263 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.10526315789 5.21951772744 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239207579515 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825544807045 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744852924454 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165268212606 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666247942588 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.