Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.
The statement states that, government should invest same in art as they do in the military. While that type of assertion may have value from a normative standpoint, in deeper analysis, I found that assertion indefensible. There are situations when national security needs to be more focused, sometimes culture need to be flourished and that is why, I think investment should not be done by comparison with each other, rather should be done depending on necessity.
Military force strength is one of the benchmark of a nation's strength in warfare and in international community. It is true that, that department needs to be invested in a large amount compared to others for the purpose of national security. But that investment is justified in a large way, as national security is the prime factor for a nation's independence and securing it's borderline. Usually government invest a large amount to strengthen military force, which is not only important for nation's strength in warfare but also for nation's intelligence, science, innovation, developments. Like in Bangladesh, in many of the countries, military force is engaged in national infrastructural development, national security intelligence, which are some of the most important issues to be focused on in the present world to survive as a free and developing country.
On the other hand, art is a sector which should be focused on to increase the life standard of the people of a nation. Appreciation of arts can be done by investing in arts gallery, museum, cultural programs, appreciating people engaged in cultural activities like, music, painting, architecture. Art is the thing that can fulfill the thirst of a human mind. Investing in art can decrease unemployment problem by engaging people in cultural activities which worked as a panacea during great depression, when the investment in art by the government alleviated the suffering in a great extent.
However, both art and military are important for a country to flourish and one can not be compared with another and can not be substituted in place of another. Funding arts can enhance the standard of spiritual quality, on the other hand, funding in military can enhance the nation's standing in case of power. There can be situations like war, when investment in military can be more important that investment in arts and vice versa. Like, in WWII, if not USA invested in military rather on arts, today they would not be the prime world power.
So, to conclude, it is evident that, investment in both of the field is important and we can not compare them. Both arts and military plays an indispensable role for a nation, that both of them should be invested properly depending on necessity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...e strength is one of the benchmark of a nations strength in warfare and in internationa...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a large way" with adverb for "large"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...urity. But that investment is justified in a large way, as national security is the prime fact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...onal security is the prime factor for a nations independence and securing its borderlin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conclude, it is evident that, investment in both of the field is important and we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, while, i think, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06026785714 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97766769515 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4375 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7269043117 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.944444444 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255925344393 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103859307575 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132087161145 0.0758088955206 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161072837557 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799664922832 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.