Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.
There is a continuous debate on allocation of governmental resources whether it should be art intense, military or science intense. To some extent, military and science issues are more vital for welfare of countries and government should give priority on these issues. However, in my opinion, there are lots of overlooked benefits of improving art intellectuality. Additionally, this decision is conditional, that is, before focusing on one side, government should analyze possible political circumstances and then take into account effects of art on citizens.
Firstly, first benefit for welfare of society is ability to grow up individuals who express themselves clearly and successfully. In fact aim of art is not just creating erudite individuals, instead, main aim of art is creating people who express their emotions, opionions and pains. For instance, in Germany, current president Merkel has contributed art fund to many primary schools including architecture, painting, accordingly, children has started to express their feelings about their environment at an early age. In this way, politicans can be aware of critics of their citizens directly without resulting larger radical problems. This illustrates us that expressing leads us to pointing out problems about people and conditions.
Secondly, another contribution of art woth to mention is that art enhances ability to think and creativity, hence, government funds training people in order to practical and efficient people inadvertently. For instance, Princton University as a public school, gains large subsidy from governmetn for investing in art courses with best teaches and workshops. Following this, people graduated from these top schools with diversified curriculums tend to be more efficient, iconoclastic and creative.
Thirdly, last and most obvious result is that art based people are interested in culture and developing themselves through their lives, followingly, they enhance their societies thinking and cultural inheritance. For instance, in France, previous presidents put high importance social sciences and arts hence we have many French philosophers, psychologist.
On the other hand, there are cases in which military issues need more attention and fund than art due to the possible political instability in these countries. For example, in Iraq military fund for precaution againts possible attacks are more essential than art. In this case military side should be ameliorated instead of art.
In conclusion, all things considered, result of this debate is conditional, that is there cases government should fund art than militart and vice versa. To sum up, government should analyze their own political situation and make their decisions considering further positive drawbacks of art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...rnmental resources whether it should be art intense, military or science intense. T...
^^^
Line 6, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ability to think and creativity, hence, government funds training people in orde...
^^
Line 6, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Princton University as a public school, gains large subsidy from governmetn for ...
^^
Line 6, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d curriculums tend to be more efficient, iconoclastic and creative. Thirdly, l...
^^
Line 8, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and cultural inheritance. For instance, in France, previous presidents put high ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2378.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73012048193 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02946674306 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9642375114 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.157894737 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4210526316 5.21951772744 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219266902271 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711168596416 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498897452328 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123193453252 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544300015884 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.1639044944 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.