It is definitely true that investing in arts would bring more glory to the particular country but it should not to be forgot that being safe should be the primary concern.
This world has already seen two wars and after that no country wouldn't be taking risk of not developing their military or not investing in defense sector. It is kind of an anecdote but true that to protect artist, they would be seeing military help.
Investing more in arts could have been true in a sense when no country is investing in military anymore and all the nation are at same level. But that is not the case in present and never that would be in near future. For example only 8 countries has got nuclear weapons in the entire world now unless almost all capable countries couldn't develop their own nuclear weapon they won't be happy. But the time when this equilibrium should arrive, countries like US would start investing more in other type of weapon which are technologically great. And again every country would start racing for that. So being in an equilibrium state in military is a myth and every country would have to invest in this.
On the contrary investing in military is tougher than investing in arts in sense of financial condition. Arts doesn't require that much of financial support as much as military do. Military requires a lot of money to be invested in buying the weapons, doing research for developing own weapons but arts doesn't require that much of money to be invested. So there is not point of investing as much in arts as military. That implies if any country is capable enough to invest in military successfully that could easily fund to promote arts of the country.
What I believe in true sense is military requires to be funded great by the government but arts doesn't require that instead arts should be promoted in every part of the society. It might require a little fund to promote these type of things but again that would be very small as compared to military fund. After when their paintings, music etc become famous around the world, the small amount of money which was invested, they would be bringing that money to India anyway.
So a government's primary concern should be of investing money in the military but on the same page a small amount of fund should be given to arts
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...seen two wars and after that no country wouldnt be taking risk of not developing their ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'an' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
... not investing in defense sector. It is kind of an anecdote but true that to protect artis...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...now unless almost all capable countries couldnt develop their own nuclear weapon they w...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s in sense of financial condition. Arts doesnt require that much of financial support ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rch for developing own weapons but arts doesnt require that much of money to be invest...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...funded great by the government but arts doesnt require that instead arts should be pro...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 4, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a government' or simply 'governments'?
Suggestion: a government; governments
...nging that money to India anyway. So a governments primary concern should be of investing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['anyway', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'for example', 'kind of', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.199074074074 0.240241500013 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.19212962963 0.157235817809 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104166666667 0.0880659088768 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0601851851852 0.0497285424764 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.025462962963 0.0444667217837 57% => OK
Prepositions: 0.143518518519 0.12292977631 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0648148148148 0.0406280797675 160% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.37325330024 2.79330140395 85% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0300925925926 0.030933414821 97% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0925925925926 0.0997080785238 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0393518518519 0.0249443105267 158% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0162037037037 0.0148568991511 109% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2310.0 2732.02544248 85% => OK
No of words: 409.0 452.878318584 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64792176039 6.0361032391 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.315403422983 0.366273622748 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.227383863081 0.280924506359 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.129584352078 0.200843997647 65% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0709046454768 0.132149295362 54% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37325330024 2.79330140395 85% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 219.290929204 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437652811736 0.48968727796 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.7079163836 55.4138127331 84% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.7222222222 23.380412469 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4464666772 59.4972553346 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 141.124799967 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7222222222 23.380412469 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.388888888889 0.674092028746 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 45.4606085303 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.46666666667 1.64882698954 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367486191932 0.391690518653 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.141677906136 0.123202303941 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0573598199371 0.077325440228 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.612069971777 0.547984918172 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163095404295 0.149214159877 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169138294037 0.161403998019 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693010523855 0.0892212321368 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.386897750579 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0753454868723 0.0692045440612 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237229882323 0.275328986314 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773146391427 0.0653680567796 118% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.