It might be said true that as more and more we are relying on technology we are not solving our day to day problems like calculation etc. But we should also not forget to state that developing these technologies requires critical thinking. Which has improved our problem solving techniques from the time when we were not dependent so much on technology.
Previously we used to think about doing a task and now we think that how we could develop a machine so that it would do this task, both of them required different kind of thinking. First one really required about how much do you know about solving a problem but in addition to this you should also know how would you develop a machine like that in other case. Obviously the latter one has improved our efficiency of performing some task, reduced time of doing that etc.
Now let's take an example of data interpretation, which had not been possible to this much extant if we didn't have so much developed technology. To analyze so much data you really needed an algorithm and to develop this it would lead you to thinking more and more.
Earlier those task which required laborious work to be performed again and again, we have converted them into an algorithm which is now doing that laborious work for us in lesser time, and the time which you didn't indulge in this work, could be used to solve or think some other problem.
Technology also provides information which is not also easily available, which leads to a more and more knowledge a person can get. Which could lead a human being to develop more and more awesome that this world sees. In other sense, technology has made it easy to contact people staying far from you. Now discussing on an issue or on a topic had not been same as previous it was. You could discuss anything on a problem with a fellow researcher, living far from here and could discuss the analogy to solve the problem.
Now at last, the question pops up that if person's thinking is getting deteriorated? It always depends in the society you are living in. We would really never be able to compare both of the thinking. As I had previously told that in previous time, a person had to know how to solve a mundane problem and a person's smartness/thinking ability could be judged based on that but now in this era of technology a person should know what type of tools are required so that he could have solved the same problem in lesser time and greater efficiency, and it makes up the basis for judging a person's smartness / thinking ability.
Now since criteria of analyzing one's ability has been changed in a manner, commenting about his thinking should not be done. But somehow it could be easily seen in a particular area or dimension as problem solving techniques etc.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...echnologies requires critical thinking. Which has improved our problem solving techni...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...been possible to this much extant if we didnt have so much developed technology. To a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...uch developed technology. To analyze so much data you really needed an algorithm and...
^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... in lesser time, and the time which you didnt indulge in this work, could be used to ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 305, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ow how to solve a mundane problem and a persons smartness/thinking ability could be jud...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 582, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...and it makes up the basis for judging a persons smartness / thinking ability. Now sinc...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ility. Now since criteria of analyzing ones ability has been changed in a manner, c...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'in addition', 'kind of', 'you know']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.172675521822 0.240241500013 72% => OK
Verbs: 0.214421252372 0.157235817809 136% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0683111954459 0.0880659088768 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0777988614801 0.0497285424764 156% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0683111954459 0.0444667217837 154% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.111954459203 0.12292977631 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0796963946869 0.0406280797675 196% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.5234918817 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0322580645161 0.030933414821 104% => OK
Particles: 0.00379506641366 0.0016655270985 228% => OK
Determiners: 0.0891840607211 0.0997080785238 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.034155597723 0.0249443105267 137% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.022770398482 0.0148568991511 153% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2756.0 2732.02544248 101% => OK
No of words: 494.0 452.878318584 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57894736842 6.0361032391 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.275303643725 0.366273622748 75% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.220647773279 0.280924506359 79% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.133603238866 0.200843997647 67% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.085020242915 0.132149295362 64% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5234918817 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425101214575 0.48968727796 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.0078385337 55.4138127331 87% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.7 23.380412469 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.2237800153 59.4972553346 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.8 141.124799967 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 23.380412469 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.45 0.674092028746 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.94800884956 141% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 46.7647773279 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.01052631579 1.64882698954 61% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390301094306 0.391690518653 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108029779035 0.123202303941 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0783276505902 0.077325440228 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.565010487767 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180973355382 0.149214159877 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143207964458 0.161403998019 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077286972855 0.0892212321368 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.232450943217 0.385218514788 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0201407731033 0.0692045440612 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223467488913 0.275328986314 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972154813275 0.0653680567796 149% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.