Governments should not fund any science research who consequences are unclear
I believe that governments shouldn’t fund research whose consequences are unclear, but it doesn’t mean that it would always produces expected achievements even with anticipated results.
Every research project should have clear goals and consequences, especially government-funded, we could not waste public money and shoot in the dark. Once the government invests the research, there should be achievement or finding carried out and help the public interest eventually. If the research comes with a specific consequence, then the research staff would work toward the goals clearly. Like the project kick-off in the business, there is carefully monitored and tracked to make sure the investment productive. For example, Taiwan government funded several projects in semiconductor field in order to help technologies companies grow and develop capabilities so that they could compete with other worldwide companies. And eventually the developed technologies successfully become the initial bedrock of TSMC(Taiwan Semiconductor manufacturing Company) which is world’s 1st semiconductor manufacturing company today.
On the contrary, If the uncertainty of the research is allowed, it causes several problems. The governments who have no idea to anticipate what kind of results produced have no way to estimate the impact of results and it could be dangerous. If human-cloning is allowed to investigate, there are many people having identical gene with someone. It corrupts the security rules based on the unique identity of gene. For instance, if one of clone steals money and then his fingerprint is found by police. However, it’s hard for justice to determine which one violating laws, because all of clones have the same fingerprints and face. Therefore, governments should not fund research with unclear results like human-cloning.
Additionally, the research expecting certain consequence doesn’t always produce expected results, it could be successful for the original target, fail or even becomes a solution for other problems. For example, Minoxidil was a medicine originally for high blood pressure treatment. It comes with side effects that could cause hair growth and eventually turn out to be the external topical solution to the skin of the head for curing bald. Another example is that the industrial revolution happened during the 19th century, the invented steam generators substitute for massive labor work, but they also cause a lot of people losing their jobs. Therefore, even the consequence is predicted clearly, the final impact of the research is still unknown.
To conclusion, the clear targets for government-funded research plan are necessary to use budget efficiently, In contrast, that with unknown results shouldn’t be funded because it could be adverse to security. And the results could be unexpected even with lucid targets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-28 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2024-11-25 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 54 | view |
| 2024-11-24 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 54 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 83
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee We recommend that Grove College preserve its century old tradition of all female education rather t 58
- Reducing Pollution 83
- Governments should not fund any science research who consequences are unclear 83
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'produce'
Suggestion: produce
...ut it doesn’t mean that it would always produces expected achievements even with anticip...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...t invests the research, there should be achievement or finding carried out and help the pub...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in contrast, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2437.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6412037037 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09793059911 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56712962963 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4338387359 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.047619048 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235253789669 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725801731322 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906193449933 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146032191832 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598517659581 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.