The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I mostly believe that people could learn lesson and dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times by studying history.
Firstly, one of the most advantageous point that people could learn from history is preventing from making the same mistake again. As known, the greedy nature of human never stop as time pass by. For instance, China have five-thousand history and there are more than ten dynasties of it. The history tells us that the power and money eroded the mind of the king of the nation and then the government corrupted and collapsed because the centralized politic system has been prevailed since then. If a leader or president studies the history, then he or she could that people have not changed and they are not different between now and past.
Secondly, people never learn that peace is the most crucial thing. Even some counties become developed and enlightened, some still attack other nations. For example, the World War I and World War II. Many people suffered and died in the wars, but it still happened.
The naysayers may argue that the background is quite different between now and past. Based on the disparate context, some points that happened in the past could not apply to the situation today. Of course, the information explosion by technology advancement today makes information much more accessible than it was years ago. People don't need to go to libraries that was only available in the capital city years ago, but rather study online at home. Another example is that the benefit of trading across nation is less significant today than it was before. Because the transportation is much more convenient and accordingly increases accessibility and degrade the profit due to supply boosted. Before industrialization, companies trade with boats taking several months conveying goods from China to Europe. In contrast, it only takes one day flight for the same route. Thus, these cases show that something did change and the difference is conspicuous between before and now.
In conclusion, people could benefit by studying from history except the background changed due to technology evolution based on the reasons mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | raghavchauhan619 | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | AmieeZhao | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | maryle | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 83
- Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reason 65
- According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic en 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for people to move out of their hometowns when they become adults, instead of staying in their home communities for their whole lives. Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 76
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice for a client."Most homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last heating season 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ied in the wars, but it still happened. The naysayers may argue that the backgro...
^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ccessible than it was years ago. People dont need to go to libraries that was only a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, even so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13461538462 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63807654028 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585164835165 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8649911293 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.45 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248427653667 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647528997846 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983345894749 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171091394745 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145060306775 0.0667264976115 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.