Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In research funding is one of the most important things among other factors. Governments have to think about funding a scientific research project and have to consider different aspects for getting persuasive consequences or desired outcomes In the prompt it is stated that fund should be avaiable only to the known outcomes and I mostly agree that for two reasons
Firstly, money should not be wasted on for unclear scientific projects. In other words, scientific project which have definite direction for desired outcomes should get the found For example, when someones work shows primarily a great indication, the it is imperative to give him/her the fund for futher investigating or researching on the project to make a final results, and government will quite sure that money would not be wasted and the invention will benefits the people Like vaccine project, whose showed good indication, got the fund and eventually saved the governments money and saved humankind
Secondly, when clear consequences of rsearch projects would get fund, other will try hard and fas! to do good research from being motivated this fact. For instances, when research projects may show unclear consequencs, research will the try to find the factors whats got wrong here and hereby he she will come up with the wrongs he she did it might be in data collection the wrong hypothesis or anything) So this will surely motivated to pursue a well articulated consequences in scientific projects and eventually benefitted the society nation and eventually humankind
However in some cases, a unclear scientific research leads to major breakthrough in the field of science and we can not discount that easily For example Penicillin' was discovered accidently when research was working on bacteria Like that so many examples are in our hands that we can give consent that sometimes ungurded direction is also useful That is why in some cases scientific research which consequences do not articulate enoungh also claimed to be funded by government
In conclusion statement is quite complex to give a definite answer but we definetly say that most of the cases funding should be considered only for the projects whose shoes a good, clear and persuasive results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...ork shows primarily a great indication, the it is imperative to give him/her the fund ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...ld not be wasted and the invention will benefits the people Like vaccine project, whose ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
..., got the fund and eventually saved the governments money and saved humankind Secondly, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
... get fund, other will try hard and fas! to do good research from being motivated t...
^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...search will the try to find the factors whats got wrong here and hereby he she will c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'motivate'
Suggestion: motivate
...othesis or anything So this will surely motivated to pursue a well articulated consequenc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...iety nation and eventually humankind However in some cases, a unclear scientific res...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...lly humankind However in some cases, a unclear scientific research leads to ma...
^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'unclear scientific research'.
Suggestion: unclear scientific research
...lly humankind However in some cases, a unclear scientific research leads to major breakthrough in the fiel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: MAJOR_BREAKTHROUGH[1]
Message: Use simply 'breakthrough'.
Suggestion: breakthrough
... a unclear scientific research leads to major breakthrough in the field of science and we can not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18457300275 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76928982689 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512396694215 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 20.2370786517 20% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 90.0 23.0359550562 391% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 385.451277725 60.3974514979 638% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 470.5 118.986275619 395% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 90.75 23.4991977007 386% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 36.0 5.21951772744 690% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204555066347 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13485310049 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499393020728 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122419904874 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039515202564 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 48.3 14.1392134831 342% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -19.87 48.8420337079 -41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 7.92365168539 216% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 38.4 12.1743820225 315% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.95 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.54 8.38706741573 138% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 38.0 11.2143820225 339% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.