Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students

Essay topics:

Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.

Education plays an imperative role in students' lives. Without education, no one can compete in this precarious world. An educated individual can think of several solutions when exposed to problems and difficulties; however, it is not the case with an uneducated person. But, it's not feasible for the government to facilitate free education for every individual. There are several disadvantages attached to it.

While the education centers provide several facilities of free education, scholarships, and accommodations, the students are misusing and undermining the significance of it. Even equipped with free education policy, students are failing to attend lectures. The students are reluctant to participate actively in the lectures. The line says, "What we have, we do not care to value it". Similarly, if the students have the facility of free education, it's insignificant for them to understand the true value of it. For instance, if we take 2 students with opposite family backgrounds; a farmer and a businessman son. Its' mostly true that if both the children would have been granted the facility of free education, then the farmers' son would be mature enough to understand the importance of it while the businessman's son would be indifferent as he is backed up properly by his father's support.

Moreover, the government funding all the money for the student's education will be impecunious to raise funds for other public services. For example, if the Indian government initiates the fundraising for education then, no money would be left for other public services: healthcare, construction, and infrastructures - ultimately leading to the increased tax. With the increased tax rates, it would not be feasible for the government to handle public abuse and criticism. Therefore, it's an inappropriate solution for the government to provide free education in colleges and universities. However, the government could help the needy.

Only for a genuine cause, the people who are not financially stable, the government could facilitate them with funds and policies. Many revolutionary schemes have been introduced by the government to raise funds for education for the poor people. A popular scheme, 'Grow India - Study India', is reaching an apex by inculcating a myriad of students into education. With the help of this scheme, the literacy rate in India has increased by 20% in the last 2 years.

As discussed in the aforementioned points, the government should not be completely responsible for raising the funds for education. However, they could help the poor and the needy by providing them with several schemes and policies.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-09 batterylow_123 30 view
2024-04-11 Theophilus Ebuka Odoh 66 view
2024-03-03 LauraTing 54 view
2023-08-23 omkarraj 66 view
2023-08-22 dhruv7315 82 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 666, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...s mostly true that if both the children would have been granted the facility of free education,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 731, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'farmers'' or 'farmer's'?
Suggestion: farmers'; farmer's
...he facility of free education, then the farmers son would be mature enough to understan...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...overnment funding all the money for the students education will be impecunious to raise ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39036144578 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11784724198 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489156626506 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5556880287 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2608695652 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0434782609 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219568821089 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749330113365 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632866177491 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122431448766 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444821701546 0.0667264976115 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.